ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2021
Mediastinal staging for non-small cell lung cancer.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and clinical validation of a novel deep learning-based mediastinal endoscopic ultrasound navigation system for quality control: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Development and validation of a deep learning signature for predicting lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma: comparison with radiomics signature and clinical-semantic model.European radiology · 2023Trial
- Prognostic and Diagnostic Value of Node-RADS for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surgical nodal sampling established by Commission on Cancer Standard 5.8 is essential for accurate lung cancer staging.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary international expert consensus recommendations on tissue acquisition in non-small cell lung cancer.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Mediastinal staging and restaging techniques in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of neoadjuvant and perioperative chemoimmunotherapy-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during robotic bronchoscopy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Breaking: The New 9Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Histopathological and Molecular Predictors of the First Site of Dissemination in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Flexible Bronchoscopy and Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Staging: A Narrative Review of Modern Techniques for Optimized Clinical Decision-Making.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Circulating Hsp70: a tumor biomarker for lymph node metastases and early relapse in thoracic cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical TNM Lung Cancer Staging: A Diagnostic Algorithm with a Pictorial Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Unlocking the potential of immunotherapy for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Clinical utility of artificial intelligence-augmented endobronchial ultrasound elastography in lymph node staging for lung cancer.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
- A prospective study to compare the diagnostic accuracy ofJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Sublobar Resection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Wedge Resection vs. Segmentectomy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Diagnostic modalities in the mediastinum and the role of bronchoscopy in mediastinal assessment: a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostic Evaluation of Mediastinal Malignant Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The impact of staging FDG-PET/CT on treatment for stage III NSCLC - an analysis of population-based data from Ontario, Canada.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A deep learning-based system for mediastinum station localization in linear EUS (with video).Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The staging of mediastinal lymph nodes for lung cancer is crucial for planning treatments or reinterventions. In potentially curable patients the aim of mediastinal staging is to exclude the presence of malignancy in mediastinal lymph nodes with a high level of accuracy while also considering clinical factors and the balance of the benefits and risks of tissue sampling techniques. Mediastinal staging is based on computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) and can be sufficient when no mediastinal abnormalities are present and the probability of unforeseen N2 disease is low. In the case of bulky lymph nodes with a high probability of malignancy in PET-CT, tissue confirmation is not normally required. If mediastinal sampling is needed it can be achieved by endosonographic techniques, including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or a combination of the two. Positive results do not need further confirmation. In the case of negative results, surgical techniques still play a role in the selected cases discussed by multidisciplinary lung cancer committees. New mediastinal surgical techniques including video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy (VACM), video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA), and transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) have been shown to be useful in selected patients. Final pathological staging is based on lymph node removal during surgery and can be achieved by taking one of two approaches: lymph node sampling or systematic lymph node sampling. The accuracy of PET-CT and mediastinal endosonography is lower for mediastinal restaging than it is for surgical techniques; their false positive and false negative (FN) rate is high and so, they require histological confirmation. Here we explain and revise the results from the most recent studies and current international guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.