Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569322›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2021

Perioperative comparison of video-assisted thoracic surgery and open lobectomy for pT1-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients in China: a multi-center propensity score-matched analysis.

Jinming Xu, Heng Ni, Yihe Wu, Jinlin Cao, Xingpeng Han, Lunxu Liu, Xiangning Fu, Yin Li, Xiaofei Li, Lin Xu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Non-small cell lung cancer in China.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. [Targeted killing of CD133Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jinming XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Heng NiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yihe WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jinlin CaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Xingpeng HanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lunxu LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiangning FuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yin LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaofei LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lin XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Cancer Institute of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Heng ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Deruo LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin PengMedical Affairs, Linkdoc Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China.
Jian HuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompared with open surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has innovated the concept of the minimally invasive approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in past decades. This present study aimed to compare the perioperative and lymph node dissection outcomes between VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy for pathological stage T1 (pT1) NSCLC patients from both surgical and oncologic perspectives.

methodsThis was a retrospective multicenter study. Patients who underwent surgical resection for pT1 NSCLC between January 2014 and September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from 10 thoracic surgery centers in China. Perioperative and lymph node dissection outcomes of pT1 NSCLC patients who accepted VATS or open lobectomies were compared by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

resultsOf the 11,360 patients who underwent surgery for pT1 NSCLC, 7,726 were enrolled based on the selection criteria, including 1,222 cases of open lobectomies and 6,504 cases of VATS lobectomies. PSM resulted in 1,184 cases of open lobectomies and 1,184 cases of VATS lobectomies being well matched by common prognostic variables, including age, sex, and surgical side. VATS lobectomy led to better perioperative outcomes, including less blood loss (133.5±200.1

conclusionsVATS lobectomy was associated with better perioperative outcomes, such as less blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, less chest drainage volume and less postoperative complications. Open lobectomy has improved lymph node dissection outcomes, as more lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes were dissected for pT1 NSCLC patients during surgery.

Indexed as

lymph node dissectionNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)pathological stage T1perioperative outcomesthoracic surgeryvideo-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID33569322
PMCPMC7867771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.