Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569277›Full record

ReviewAsian journal of urology2021

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy-A review of literature.

Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat, Srinivas Samavedi, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Fikret Fatih Onol, Shannon Roof, Travis Rogers, Vipul R Patel, Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asian journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [MR-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy from Radiologists' Perspective].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam BhatDepartment of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States.
Srinivas SamavediThe Hays Medical Centre, University of Kansas Health System, Hays, KS, USA.
Marcio Covas MoschovasDepartment of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States.
Fikret Fatih OnolDepartment of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States.
Shannon RoofDepartment of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States.
Travis RogersDepartment of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States.
Vipul R PatelDepartment of Urology, AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, United States.
Ananthakrishnan SivaramanChennai Urology and Robotics Institute, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
AdventHealth Celebration · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) helps to identify lesion of prostate with reasonable accuracy. We aim to describe the various uses of MP-MRI for prostate biopsy comparing different techniques of MP-MRI guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature search was performed for "multiparametric MRI", "MRI fusion biopsy", "MRI guided biopsy", "prostate biopsy", "MRI cognitive biopsy", "MRI fusion biopsy systems", "prostate biopsy" and "cost analysis". The search operation was performed using the operator "OR" and "AND" with the above key words. All relevant systematic reviews, original articles, case series, and case reports were selected for this review.

resultsThe sensitivity of MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is between 91%-93%, and the specificity is between 36%-41% in various studies. It also has a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%-92% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 51%-52%. The yield of MRI fusion biopsy (MRI-FB) is similar, if not superior to MR cognitive biopsy. In-bore MRI-TB had better detection rates compared to MR cognitive biopsy, but were similar to MR fusion biopsy.

conclusionsThe use of MRI guidance in prostate biopsy is inevitable, subject to availability, cost, and experience. Any one of the three modalities (

Indexed as

MRI cognitive biopsyMRI fusion biopsyMRI fusion technologyMRI targeted biopsyProstate biopsy

Identifiers

PMID33569277
PMCPMC7859420
OpenAlexW3045835703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.