ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2021
Radiological imaging and pathological findings of small lung adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The eighth edition of the Lung Cancer Handling Regulations defines the pathological findings of "invasion" in the pathological diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and terms it as adenocarcinoma in situ/minimally invasive carcinoma. In addition, the invasion diameter (tumor diameter excluding the lepidic growth region) was adopted as the pT factor, and the classification further reflected prognosis (degree of invasion/progression). Meanwhile, computed tomography imaging-based classification, where the consolidation (nodule) diameter excluding the ground glass shadow area was defined as cT, and the classification reflected the pathological invasion diameter. It is clear that the revision of the eighth edition has reduced discrepancies in the pathological findings of lung adenocarcinoma in CT imaging and assessment of the degree of invasion and progression. At the same time, the 8th edition is not yet accurate enough. Therefore, we will discuss imaging techniques to better predict the extent of adenocarcinoma invasion and progression, based on our own findings and the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.