ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021
Uniport
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Early clinical outcomes of anatomical lung resection for primary lung cancer using the hinotori™ surgical robot system: a single-institution prospective observational study of perioperative outcomes in 36 cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- A nationwide survey of uniportal thoracoscopic anatomical pulmonary resections in Japan.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Surgical technique of uniportal VATS for pneumothorax: the lateral and subxiphoid approaches.Journal of visualized surgery · 2026Article
- Utilising uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pericardial window: A 12-year single-centre experience in the diagnosis and treatment of pericardial effusion.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025Article
- Safety and perioperative outcomes of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- A New Index for the Quantitative Evaluation of Surgical Invasiveness Based on Perioperative Patients' Behavior Patterns: Machine Learning Approach Using Triaxial Acceleration.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2023Article
- Feasibility and safety of uniportal thoracoscopy for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The impact of novel instrumentation in promoting uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Uniportal left S1 + 2 segmentectomy.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Experience of a modified chest tube suture-fixation technique in uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- The pros and cons of uniportal VATS segmentectomy in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer: should the procedure be prioritized?Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Ameliorated chest drain wound closure in patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- A dense fissure is not a contra-indication for uniportal thoracoscopic lobectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy provides good perioperative results and early postoperative recovery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- aBVA Procedure by Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Right Upper Peripheral Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A uniportal right upper lobectomy by three-arm robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using theTranslational lung cancer research · 2021Article
- Beyond the ports: outcomes in uni-port vs. multi-port video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lung resections.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been recognized as a standard procedure, but whether uniport VATS (U-VATS) is a more effective and minimally invasive approach compared with multiport VATS (M-VATS) is controversial.
methodsThe medical records of 184 patients in the M-VATS group and 69 patients in the U-VATS group who underwent anatomical lung resection from April 2017 to July 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative outcomes were compared among U-VATS and M-VATS. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors that reduce postoperative pain.
resultsThe mean operation time was significantly shorter in U-VATS than in M-VATS (172±43 min in M-VATS
conclusionsU-VATS shortened the operation time, postoperative drainage duration, and hospitalization compared with conventional M-VATS, and it significantly reduced the use of analgesics. There were no differences in perioperative results such as blood loss and the postoperative complication rate. U-VATS can be said to be a safe and minimally invasive surgical procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.