Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569170›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2021

Enhanced neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation to support separation of craniopagus twins.

Sohaib R Rufai, Sri Gore, Sian E Handley, Oliver R Marmoy, Juling Ong, David J Dunaway, Noor Ul Owase Jeelani

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sohaib R RufaiClinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-6393
Sri GoreClinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Sian E HandleyClinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Oliver R MarmoyClinical and Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Juling OngUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK & Craniofacial Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
David J DunawayUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK & Craniofacial Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Noor Ul Owase JeelaniUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK & Craniofacial Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N004566/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniopagus conjoined twins are extraordinarily rare and present unique challenges to the multidisciplinary team. There is a paucity of literature on optimizing neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation in craniopagus twins. Herein, we present our enhanced neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation and management in 17-month-old male craniopagus twins, uniquely using handheld optical coherence tomography (OCT) plus portable slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy and modified forced-choice preferential looking assessment. Staged surgical separation was supported by enhanced neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation, detailed radiology, three-dimensional printing and virtual reality simulation. This represents the fourth separation of craniopagus twins by our unit.

Identifiers

PMID33569170
PMCPMC7861574
OpenAlexW3127093808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.