Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33569049›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Empirical and Rational Design of T Cell Receptor-Based Immunotherapies.

Heather F Jones, Zaki Molvi, Martin G Klatt, Tao Dao, David A Scheinberg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Immunotherapy of Neuroblastoma: Facts and Hopes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Emerging new therapeutic antibody derivatives for cancer treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather F JonesMolecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Zaki MolviWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Martin G KlattMolecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Tao DaoMolecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
David A ScheinbergMolecular Pharmacology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
T LYMPHOCYTE SUBSET FUNCTION POST-TRANSPLANTATIONP01CA023766 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI PAMER, ERIC G. · 1985 to 2023
$59.0M
CANCER PHARMACOLOGYT32CA062948 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI LORRAINE J GUDAS · 1994 to 2026
$12.1M
Understanding and Mimicking TCR Recognition with Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies.R35CA241894 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DAVID A SCHEINBERG · 2020 to 2026
$7.2M
RECOMBINANT ANTICD33 ANTIBODY FOR AMLR01CA055349 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SCHEINBERG, DAVID A · 1991 to 2020
$6.8M
A High Throughput Method to Determine the Target of T Cell ReceptorsF31CA253995 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JONES, HEATHER · 2020 to 2021
$92k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA253995NCI NIH HHS P01 CA023766NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA055349NCI NIH HHS R35 CA241894NCI NIH HHS T32 CA062948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of T cells reactive with intracellular tumor-associated or tumor-specific antigens has been a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapies in the past three decades, but the approach has been constrained by a limited understanding of the T cell receptor's (TCR) complex functions and specificities. Newer TCR and T cell-based approaches are in development, including engineered adoptive T cells with enhanced TCR affinities, TCR mimic antibodies, and T cell-redirecting bispecific agents. These new therapeutic modalities are exciting opportunities by which TCR recognition can be further exploited for therapeutic benefit. In this review we summarize the development of TCR-based therapeutic strategies and focus on balancing efficacy and potency versus specificity, and hence, possible toxicity, of these powerful therapeutic modalities.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Cellbispecific T cell engagercross-reactivityimmune mobilizing monoclonal T cell receptors against cancerpeptide- major histocompatibility complexesT cell receptorT cell receptor mimic monoclonal antibodyT cell receptor-T celltumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID33569049
PMCPMC7868419
OpenAlexW3121804747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.