Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568938›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2021

Development and Psychometric Testing of the Japanese Version of the Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yuh Yamashita, Tomohiko Nishigami, Akira Mibu, Katsuyoshi Tanaka, Benedict M Wand, Mark J Catley, Toshio Higashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuh YamashitaNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8520, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-7634
Tomohiko NishigamiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Mihara, Hiroshima, 723-0053, Japan.
Akira MibuDepartment of Nursing and Physical Therapy, Konan Women's University, Kobe, Hyogo, 658-0001, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6141-7809
Katsuyoshi TanakaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Tennouji-ku, Osaka, 543-0027, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2322-0287
Benedict M WandSchool of Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, 6959, Australia.
Mark J CatleySchool of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Toshio HigashiNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8520, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContemporary theories of pain suggest that how the body is perceived is central to the emergence of pain. The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) was developed to assess body-perception specific to the back in people with chronic low back pain. However, there is no comprehensive measure to quantify self-perception of the painful area in Japanese people with neck pain. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of a self-perception questionnaire specific to the neck and evaluate the validity and reliability of the scale using Rasch analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire (FreNAQ-J) was developed by modifying the FreBAQ-J. One hundred people with chronic neck pain and fifty-six matched healthy controls completed the questionnaire. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate targeting, category order, unidimensionality, person fit, internal consistency, differential item functioning, and differential test functioning in the neck pain population. Validity was investigated by examining the relationship between the FreNAQ-J and clinical status.

resultsPeople with chronic neck pain endorsed FreNAQ-J items with greater frequency than healthy controls. FreNAQ-J did not reject the null hypothesis of fitting the Rasch model, had acceptable internal consistency and good test-retest reliability. Summed FreNAQ-J scores were significantly correlated with pain intensity, disability, pain-related catastrophizing and fear of movement.

conclusionThe individual items of the FreNAQ-J can be validly summed to provide a score of self-perception. The FreNAQ-J is the first scale developed for comprehensively evaluating disturbed body perception in Japanese patients with chronic neck pain.

Indexed as

neck painneck-specific body-perception questionnaireRasch analysisreliability and validity

Identifiers

PMID33568938
PMCPMC7870290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.