ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021
Biological Significance of
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between cigarette smoking history, metabolic phenotypes, andJournal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Identification of EGFR mutation status in male patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: role ofEJNMMI research · 2023Article
- A Review of the Correlation Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status andFrontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- PET/CT Radiomic Features: A Potential Biomarker for EGFR Mutation Status and Survival Outcome Prediction in NSCLC Patients Treated With TKIs.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The combined role of PET/CT metabolic parameters and inflammatory markers in detecting extensive disease in small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Deep Radiotranscriptomics of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma for Assessing Molecular and Histology Subtypes with a Data-Driven Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the potential of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor (
methodsClinical data of 311 NSCLC patients who had undergone both
results
conclusionSUVmax of the primary tumors has the potential to serve as a biomarker to predict
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.