Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568824›Full record

ReviewNature2021

Origins of modern human ancestry.

Anders Bergström, Chris Stringer, Mateja Hajdinjak, Eleanor M L Scerri, Pontus Skoglund

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ancient DNA and Human Physiology.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Homo luzonensis and the role of homoplasy in the morphology of hominin insular species.Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Pan-African model explainsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Parallels and discrepancies between non-native species introductions and human migration.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  20. Decoding the Dynamics of Cultural Change: A Cultural Evolution Approach to the Psychology of Acculturation.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2025
    Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anders BergströmAncient Genomics Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Chris StringerDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK. c.stringer@nhm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9183-7337
Mateja HajdinjakAncient Genomics Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4064-0331
Eleanor M L ScerriPan-African Evolution Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Science of Human History, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7468-9977
Pontus SkoglundAncient Genomics Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK. pontus.skoglund@crick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3021-5913

Funding

European Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 217223/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New finds in the palaeoanthropological and genomic records have changed our view of the origins of modern human ancestry. Here we review our current understanding of how the ancestry of modern humans around the globe can be traced into the deep past, and which ancestors it passes through during our journey back in time. We identify three key phases that are surrounded by major questions, and which will be at the frontiers of future research. The most recent phase comprises the worldwide expansion of modern humans between 40 and 60 thousand years ago (ka) and their last known contacts with archaic groups such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. The second phase is associated with a broadly construed African origin of modern human diversity between 60 and 300 ka. The oldest phase comprises the complex separation of modern human ancestors from archaic human groups from 0.3 to 1 million years ago. We argue that no specific point in time can currently be identified at which modern human ancestry was confined to a limited birthplace, and that patterns of the first appearance of anatomical or behavioural traits that are used to define Homo sapiens are consistent with a range of evolutionary histories.

Indexed as

PedigreeAfricaAnimalsFossilsGene FlowHistory, AncientHuman MigrationHumansNeanderthals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.