Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568724›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A non-invasive method to generate induced pluripotent stem cells from primate urine.

Johanna Geuder, Lucas E Wange, Aleksandar Janjic, Jessica Radmer, Philipp Janssen, Johannes W Bagnoli, Stefan Müller, Artur Kaul, Mari Ohnuki, Wolfgang Enard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna GeuderAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Lucas E WangeAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Aleksandar JanjicAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Jessica RadmerAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Philipp JanssenAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Johannes W BagnoliAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Stefan MüllerInstitute of Human Genetics, Munich University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Artur KaulInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Center, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Mari OhnukiAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. ohnuki@biologie.uni-muenchen.de.
Wolfgang EnardAnthropology and Human Genomics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. enard@bio.lmu.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEGerman Primate Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparing the molecular and cellular properties among primates is crucial to better understand human evolution and biology. However, it is difficult or ethically impossible to collect matched tissues from many primates, especially during development. An alternative is to model different cell types and their development using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). These can be generated from many tissue sources, but non-invasive sampling would decisively broaden the spectrum of non-human primates that can be investigated. Here, we report the generation of primate iPSCs from urine samples. We first validate and optimize the procedure using human urine samples and show that suspension- Sendai Virus transduction of reprogramming factors into urinary cells efficiently generates integration-free iPSCs, which maintain their pluripotency under feeder-free culture conditions. We demonstrate that this method is also applicable to gorilla and orangutan urinary cells isolated from a non-sterile zoo floor. We characterize the urinary cells, iPSCs and derived neural progenitor cells using karyotyping, immunohistochemistry, differentiation assays and RNA-sequencing. We show that the urine-derived human iPSCs are indistinguishable from well characterized PBMC-derived human iPSCs and that the gorilla and orangutan iPSCs are well comparable to the human iPSCs. In summary, this study introduces a novel and efficient approach to non-invasively generate iPSCs from primate urine. This will extend the zoo of species available for a comparative approach to molecular and cellular phenotypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsLeukocytes, MononuclearNeural Stem CellsPrimatesUrine

Identifiers

PMID33568724
PMCPMC7876031
OpenAlexW3126923998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.