Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568692›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Effect of repetition on the behavioral and neuronal responses to ambiguous Necker cube images.

Vladimir Maksimenko, Alexander Kuc, Nikita Frolov, Semen Kurkin, Alexander Hramov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vladimir MaksimenkoNeuroscience and Cognitive Technology Laboratory, Center for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, 1 Universitetskaya str., Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420500. maximenkovl@gmail.com.
Alexander KucNeuroscience and Cognitive Technology Laboratory, Center for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, 1 Universitetskaya str., Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420500.
Nikita FrolovNeuroscience and Cognitive Technology Laboratory, Center for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, 1 Universitetskaya str., Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420500.
Semen KurkinNeuroscience and Cognitive Technology Laboratory, Center for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, 1 Universitetskaya str., Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420500.
Alexander HramovNeuroscience and Cognitive Technology Laboratory, Center for Technologies in Robotics and Mechatronics Component, Innopolis University, 1 Universitetskaya str., Innopolis, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia, 420500.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A repeated presentation of an item facilitates its subsequent detection or identification, a phenomenon of priming. Priming may involve different types of memory and attention and affects neural activity in various brain regions. Here we instructed participants to report on the orientation of repeatedly presented Necker cubes with high (HA) and low (LA) ambiguity. Manipulating the contrast of internal edges, we varied the ambiguity and orientation of the cube. We tested how both the repeated orientation (referred to as a stimulus factor) and the repeated ambiguity (referred to as a top-down factor) modulated neuronal and behavioral response. On the behavioral level, we observed higher speed and correctness of the response to the HA stimulus following the HA stimulus and a faster response to the right-oriented LA stimulus following the right-oriented stimulus. On the neuronal level, the prestimulus theta-band power grew for the repeated HA stimulus, indicating activation of the neural networks related to attention and uncertainty processing. The repeated HA stimulus enhanced hippocampal activation after stimulus onset. The right-oriented LA stimulus following the right-oriented stimulus enhanced activity in the precuneus and the left frontal gyri before the behavioral response. During the repeated HA stimulus processing, enhanced hippocampal activation may evidence retrieving information to disambiguate the stimulus and define its orientation. Increased activation of the precuneus and the left prefrontal cortex before responding to the right-oriented LA stimulus following the right-oriented stimulus may indicate a match between their orientations. Finally, we observed increased hippocampal activation after responding to the stimuli, reflecting the encoding stimulus features in memory. In line with the large body of works relating the hippocampal activity with episodic memory, we suppose that this type of memory may subserve the priming effect during the repeated presentation of ambiguous images.

Identifiers

PMID33568692
PMCPMC7876129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.