Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568347›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2021

Synthetic Lethal Screens Reveal Cotargeting FAK and MEK as a Multimodal Precision Therapy for

Justine S Paradis, Monica Acosta, Robert Saddawi-Konefka, Ayush Kishore, Frederico Gomes, Nadia Arang, Manoela Tiago, Silvia Coma, Simone Lubrano, Xingyu Wu and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Hippo signalling pathway and its impact on eye diseases.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Justine S Paradis *Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Monica Acosta *Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4202-7765
Robert Saddawi-KonefkaMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-1695
Ayush KishoreMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Frederico GomesMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4751-6111
Nadia ArangMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Manoela TiagoDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Silvia ComaVerastem Oncology, Needham, Massachusetts.
Simone LubranoMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4779-5632
Xingyu WuMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Kyle FordDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Chi-Ping DayLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5200-2372
Glenn MerlinoLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Maryland.
Prashant MaliDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Jonathan A PachterVerastem Oncology, Needham, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0263-474X
Takami SatoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-2221-0415
Andrew E AplinDepartment of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-3244
J Silvio GutkindMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. sgutkind@ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USThomas Jefferson University · USCenter for Cancer Research · USUniversity of San Diego · USVerastem (United States) · US

Funding

Genetically Engineered Mouse Models to Study RTK Function in MelanomaZIABC008756 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MERLINO, GLENN T. · 2009 to 2024
$17.7M
Using Networks to Seed Hierarchical Whole-cell Models of CancerU54CA209891 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2017 to 2021
$10.9M
Targeted therapies in mutant BRAF melanomaR01CA182635 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2014 to 2024
$3.4M
Targeting Systems Vulnerabilities in the Gαq/GNAQ Oncogenic Signaling Circuitry: New Precision Therapies for Uveal MelanomaR01CA257505 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC, GUTKIND, JORGE SILVIO · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
Mutant BRAF-regulated transcription factors in melanoma progressionR01CA196278 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI APLIN, ANDREW ERIC · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Area C: Genome-wide identification and targeting of resistance to cancer therapyR33CA225291 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GUTKIND, JORGE SILVIO, RUPPIN, EYTAN · 2017 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA182635NCI NIH HHS R01 CA196278NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257505NCI NIH HHS R33 CA225291NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUveal melanoma is the most common eye cancer in adults. Approximately 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) in the liver, even after successful treatment of the primary lesions. mUM is refractory to current chemo- and immune-therapies, and most mUM patients die within a year. Uveal melanoma is characterized by gain-of-function mutations in EXPERIMENTAL

designWe performed a kinome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 sgRNA screen to identify synthetic lethal gene interactions that can be exploited therapeutically. Candidate adaptive resistance mechanisms were investigated by cotargeting strategies in uveal melanoma and mUM

resultssgRNAs targeting the PKC and MEK-ERK signaling pathways were significantly depleted after FAK inhibition, with ERK activation representing a predominant resistance mechanism. Pharmacologic inhibition of MEK and FAK showed remarkable synergistic growth-inhibitory effects in uveal melanoma cells and exerted cytotoxic effects, leading to tumor collapse in uveal melanoma xenograft and liver mUM models

conclusionsCoupling the unique genetic landscape of uveal melanoma with the power of unbiased genetic screens, our studies reveal that FAK and MEK-ERK cotargeting may provide a new network-based precision therapeutic strategy for mUM treatment.

Indexed as

Gain of Function MutationMolecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFocal Adhesion Kinase 1Genetic TestingGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11HEK293 CellsHumansMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMelanomaMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDUveal MelanomaFocal Adhesion Kinase 1GNAQ protein, humanGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11PTK2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33568347
PMCPMC8895627
OpenAlexW3126366955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.