Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568185›Full record

ReviewJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021

Actualized inventory of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in Oaxaca, Mexico.

Cruz-Pérez Alejandra Lucía, Barrera-Ramos Jacqueline, Bernal-Ramírez Luis Alberto, Bravo-Avilez David, Rendón-Aguilar Beatriz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Effects of the methanolic extract ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Ethnomedicinal Knowledge ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Antiproliferative Effect of Methanolic Extract ofMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessment of Anticancer Properties ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cruz-Pérez Alejandra LucíaUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Avenida San Rafael Atlixco 186, Colonia Vicentina, CP. 09340, CDMX, Mexico.
Barrera-Ramos JacquelineUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Avenida San Rafael Atlixco 186, Colonia Vicentina, CP. 09340, CDMX, Mexico.
Bernal-Ramírez Luis AlbertoUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Avenida San Rafael Atlixco 186, Colonia Vicentina, CP. 09340, CDMX, Mexico.
Bravo-Avilez DavidUniversidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Avenida de las Ciencias, S/N, Juriquilla. Delegación Santa Rosa Jáuregui, CP 7623, Querétaro, Mexico.
Rendón-Aguilar BeatrizUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Avenida San Rafael Atlixco 186, Colonia Vicentina, CP. 09340, CDMX, Mexico. bra@xanum.uam.mx.
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MXAutonomous University of Queretaro · MX

Funding

Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad JF102Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana local founds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOaxaca is one of the most diverse states in Mexico from biological and cultural points of view. Different ethnic groups living there maintain deep and ancestral traditional knowledge of medicinal plants as well as traditional practices and beliefs about diseases/illnesses and cures. Previous ethnobotanical research in this state has helped document this knowledge, but with the addition of more studies, more records appear. We updated the inventory of medicinal knowledge between the different ethnic groups that inhabit the Oaxacan territory.

methodsA database was constructed from two sources: (1) original data from a 3-year project in 84 municipalities of Oaxaca inhabited by eight ethnic groups and (2) different electronic databases.

resultsRecords of 1032 medicinal plants were obtained; 164 families were registered, with Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Rubiaceae being the most commonly used. A total of 770 species were reported in 14 vegetation types; the most important species came from temperate forests. Only 144 species corresponded to introduced species, and 272 were listed in a risk category. Illnesses of the digestive and genitourinary systems as well as culture-bound syndromes were treated with high numbers of medicinal plants. The Mestizo, Mixe, Mixtec, and Zapotec ethnic groups exhibited the greatest number of recorded medicinal plants. The 17 species that were used among almost all ethnic groups in Oaxaca were also used to cure the highest number of diseases. DISCUSSION: Inventories of medicinal plants confirm the persistence of traditional knowledge and reflect the need to recognize and respect this cosmovision. Many species are gathered in wild environments. The most important illnesses or diseases recorded in the present inventory are also mentioned in different studies, suggesting that they are common health problems in the rural communities of Mexico.

conclusionsMedicinal plants are essential for ethnic groups in Oaxaca. It is necessary to recognize and understand the complex ancestral processes involved in the human-nature interaction and the role of these processes in the conservation of biodiversity and in the survivorship of ethnic groups that have persisted for centuries. Finally, this study serves as a wake-up call to respect those worldviews.

Indexed as

KnowledgeMedicine, TraditionalEthnicityEthnobotanyHumansMexicoPlants, MedicinalBiodiversityCosmovisionDiseasesEthnic groupsGatheringMedicinal plantsOaxacaRisk category

Identifiers

PMID33568185
PMCPMC7874459
OpenAlexW3126612486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.