Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568127›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Access to and adequacy of psychological services for adult patients in UK hospices: a national, cross-sectional survey.

Daisy McInnerney, Bridget Candy, Patrick Stone, Nicola Atkin, Joana Johnson, Syd Hiskey, Nuriye Kupeli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Optimizing hospice care: A scoping review of staffing strategies to enhance practice.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daisy McInnerneyWing B, Floor 6, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK. daisy.mcinnerney.18@ucl.ac.uk.
Bridget CandyWing B, Floor 6, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
Patrick StoneWing B, Floor 6, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
Nicola AtkinParkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Joana JohnsonMarie Curie Hospice, Hampstead, London, UK.
Syd HiskeyThe Oaks Hospital, Colchester, UK.
Nuriye KupeliWing B, Floor 6, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, UK.
Marie Curie · GBUniversity College London · GBMarie Curie Hospice · GBOaks Hospital · GBPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCH-18-UMarie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-UMarie Curie MCCC-FPO-16-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding psychological support to people living with terminal illness is a fundamental part of hospice care. Recent research on delivery of psychological services in hospices in the United Kingdom (UK) on a national level, including inequalities or variation in practice, is limited. A nationwide survey will highlight any differences in provision and in doing so help focus future research and inform best practice both within the UK, and internationally. The specific objectives of this survey are to (1) chart the types of psychological support available to adult patients in hospices in the UK in line with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence model; (2) explore how services are organised; and (3) gather service perspectives on adequacy of care, and facilitators and barriers to appropriate practice.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey emailed to adult hospices in the UK in November-December 2019. One staff member involved in the delivery and/or organisation of psychological support was invited to participate per hospice. Of 193 invited hospices, 116 took part.

resultsSixteen percent rated their hospice psychological service as wholly adequate. The majority reported that services can access specialist professionals, but many relied on external referrals. Barriers to best practice included funding and staff capacity; facilitators included clear referral structures, audit and appropriate needs and outcome assessments.

conclusionsAccess to psychological professionals has improved since the last survey 15 years ago, but the majority of responders felt their overall service was not wholly adequate. Basic emotional support is largely felt to be sufficient, but our results indicate a need for improvements in access to more specialist care. Partnerships with external mental health services may be key. Our findings highlight core facilitators and barriers to providing good psychological care at the end of life that should be considered by services both within the UK and on an international level.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomHospicesMental healthPalliative carePsychology, clinicalSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33568127
PMCPMC7874563
OpenAlexW3128726998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.