Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568087›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Can dedicated emergency team and area for older people reduce the hospital admission rate? - An observational pre- and post-intervention study.

Jenny Liu, Therese Palmgren, Sari Ponzer, Italo Masiello, Nasim Farrokhnia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jenny LiuDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden. jenny.liu@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-7434-3725
Therese PalmgrenDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sari PonzerDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Italo MasielloDepartment of Computer Science and Media Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Nasim FarrokhniaDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset AB, KI SÖS, Sjukhusbacken 10, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency department (ED) care of older patients is often complex. Geriatric ED guidelines can help to meet this challenge. However, training requirements, the use of time-consuming tools for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a lack of golden standard to identify the frail patients, and the weak evidence of positive outcomes of using CGA in EDs pose barriers to introduce the guidelines. Dedicating an interprofessional team of regular ED medical and nursing staff and an older-friendly ED area can be another approach. Previous studies of geriatrician-led CGA in EDs have reported a reduced hospital admission rate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a dedicated interprofessional emergency team also can reduce the hospital admission rate without the resources required by the formal use of CGA.

methodsAn observational pre-post study at a large adult ED, where all patients 80 years or older arriving on weekdays in the intervention period from 2016.09.26 to 2016.11.28 and the corresponding weekdays in the previous year from 2015.09.28 to 2015.11.30 were included. In the intervention period, older patients either received care in the geriatric module by the dedicated team or in the regular team modules for patients of mixed ages. In 2015, all patients received care in regular team modules. The primary outcome measure was the total hospital admission rate and the ED length of stay was the secondary outcome measure.

resultsWe included 2377 arrivals in the intervention period, when 26.7% (N = 634) received care in the geriatric module, and 2207 arrivals in the 2015 period. The total hospital admission rate was 61.7% (N = 1466/2377) in the intervention period compared to 64.8% (N = 1431/2207) in 2015 (p = 0.03). The difference was larger for patients treated in the geriatric module, 51.1% compared to 62.1% (95% CI: 56.3 to 68.0%) for patients who would have been eligible in 2015. The ED length of stay was longer in the intervention period.

conclusionsAn interprofessional team and area dedicated to older patients was associated to a lower hospital admission rate. Further studies are needed to confirm the results.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalAgedAged, 80 and overGeriatric AssessmentGeriatriciansHospitalsHumansEmergency departmentHospital admissionInterprofessionalLength of stayOlder patientsTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID33568087
PMCPMC7877031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.