Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33568086›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2021

Cognitive functioning in Deaf children using Cochlear implants.

Fidaa Almomani, Murad O Al-Momani, Soha Garadat, Safa Alqudah, Manal Kassab, Shereen Hamadneh, Grant Rauterkus, Richard Gans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Fidaa AlmomaniDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. falmomani@just.edu.jo.ORCID 0000-0002-7495-972X
Murad O Al-MomaniFaculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Soha GaradatDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Safa AlqudahDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Manal KassabFaculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Shereen HamadnehDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Nursing School, Al Al Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan.
Grant RauterkusAmerican Institute of Balance, Clear Water, Pinellas Park, FL, USA.
Richard GansAmerican Institute of Balance, Clear Water, Pinellas Park, FL, USA.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOAl al-Bayt University · JOAmerican Institute for Economic Research · USKing Saud University · SATulane University · USUniversity of Jordan · JOUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

Jordan University of Science and Technology/Deanship of Research Grant # 20120219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive abilities like language, memory, reasoning, visualization, and perceptual functioning shape human action and are considered critical to the successful interaction with the environment. Alternatively, hearing loss can disrupt a child's ability to communicate, and negatively impact cognitive development. Cochlear implants (CI) restore auditory input thereby supporting communication and may enhance cognitive performance. This study compares general cognitive development after cochlear implantation (2017-2019) in two groups of Jordanian children implanted earlier (age:4-6 years, N = 22) and later (7-9 years, N = 16) to the development of randomly selected normal hearing peers (N = 48).

designVisualization, reasoning, memory, and attention were assessed using the Leiter-R scale at baseline (before implantation), 8 months and 16 months post implantation for children with hearing loss. Same times of testing (baseline, 8 months and 16 months) were used for normal hearing peers.

resultsOver the 16-month period, the cognitive improvement of 4-6-year-old deaf children was greater than that of their normal hearing peers on the scales of visualization (5.62 vs. 4.40), reasoning (2.53 vs. 2.38) and memory (17.19 vs. 11.67). while the improvement of 7-9-year-old was less major than that of their normal hearing peers on all scales.

conclusionsThese results suggest that CI not only enhances communication skills but may improve cognitive functioning in deaf children. However, the extent of this improvement was dependent on age at intervention; current results demonstrated that the children received CI at young ages had better cognitive improvements.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearing LossChildChild, PreschoolCognitionHumanscochlear implantCognitive abilitiesDevelopment

Identifiers

PMID33568086
PMCPMC7874642
OpenAlexW3116265326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.