Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33567987›Full record

ReviewThe Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry2022

Resilience to Stress: Lessons from Rodents about Nature versus Nurture.

Sarah M Clinton, Keaton A Unroe, Elizabeth A Shupe, Chelsea R McCoy, Matthew E Glover

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah M ClintonSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7158-411X
Keaton A UnroeSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Elizabeth A ShupeSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Chelsea R McCoySchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Matthew E GloverSchool of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

Epigenetics, Neurodevelopment, and Emotional BehaviorR01MH105447 · NIMH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI CLINTON, SARAH M · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Neurodevelopmental Underpinnings of Rodent Anxiety and Depressive BehaviorR00MH085859 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI CLINTON, SARAH M · 2011 to 2013
$705k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH085859NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in human temperament influence how we respond to stress and can confer vulnerability (or resilience) to emotional disorders. For example, high levels of behavioral inhibition in children predict increased risk of mood and anxiety disorders in later life. The biological underpinnings of temperament are unknown, although improved understanding can offer insight into the pathogenesis of emotional disorders. Our laboratory has used a rat model of temperamental differences to study neurodevelopmental factors that lead to a highly inhibited, stress vulnerable phenotype. Selective breeding for high versus low behavioral response to novelty created two rat strains that exhibit dramatic behavior differences over multiple domains relevant to emotional disorders. Low novelty responder (bLR) rats exhibit high levels of behavioral inhibition, passive stress coping, anhedonia, decreased sociability and vulnerability to chronic stress compared to high novelty responders (bHRs). On the other hand, bHRs exhibit high levels of behavioral dis-inhibition, active coping, and aggression. This review article summarizes our work with the bHR/bLR model showing the developmental emergence of the bHR/bLR phenotypes, the role the environment plays in shaping it, and the involvement of epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation that mediate differences in emotionality and stress reactivity.

Indexed as

HippocampusRodentiaAnimalsDNA MethylationHumansRatsamygdalaDNA methylationepigeneticshigh responderhippocampuslow responderneurodevelopmentnovelty reactivity

Identifiers

PMID33567987
PMCPMC11092422
OpenAlexW3127405391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.