Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33567742›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

A Novel Language Paradigm for Intraoperative Language Mapping: Feasibility and Evaluation.

Katharina Rosengarth, Delin Pai, Frank Dodoo-Schittko, Katharina Hense, Teele Tamm, Christian Ott, Ralf Lürding, Elisabeth Bumes, Mark W Greenlee, Karl Michael Schebesch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katharina RosengarthDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Delin PaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Frank Dodoo-SchittkoInstitute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Katharina HenseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Teele TammInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Christian OttDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2867-1071
Ralf LürdingDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Elisabeth BumesDepartment of Neurology and Wilhelm Sander-NeuroOncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6915-3206
Mark W GreenleeInstitute for Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-9286
Karl Michael SchebeschDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Nils Ole SchmidtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6910-8843
Christian DoenitzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background-Mapping language using direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during an awake craniotomy is difficult without using more than one language paradigm that particularly follows the demand of DCS by not exceeding the assessment time of 4 s to prevent intraoperative complications. We designed an intraoperative language paradigm by combining classical picture naming and verb generation, which safely engaged highly relevant language functions. (2) Methods-An evaluation study investigated whether a single trial of the language task could be performed in less than 4 s in 30 healthy subjects and whether the suggested language paradigm sufficiently pictured the cortical language network using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 12 healthy subjects. In a feasibility study, 24 brain tumor patients conducted the language task during an awake craniotomy. The patients' neuropsychological outcomes were monitored before and after surgery. (3) Results-The fMRI results in healthy subjects showed activations in a language-associated network around the (left) sylvian fissure. Single language trials could be performed within 4 s. Intraoperatively, all tumor patients showed DCS-induced language errors while conducting the novel language task. Postoperatively, mild neuropsychological impairments appeared compared to the presurgical assessment. (4) Conclusions-These data support the use of a novel language paradigm that safely monitors highly relevant language functions intraoperatively, which can consequently minimize negative postoperative neuropsychological outcomes.

Indexed as

awake surgerydirect cortical stimulationintraoperative language mappingneuropsychological outcome

Identifiers

PMID33567742
PMCPMC7915060
OpenAlexW3126517937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.