Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33567711›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Efficiency of GnRH-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles for Inducing LH Secretion and Fertile Ovulations in Protocols for Artificial Insemination in Rabbit Does.

Eman M Hassanein, Nesrein M Hashem, Kheir El-Din M El-Azrak, Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes, Gamal A Hassan, Mohamed H Salem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanomedicine for Maternal and Fetal Health.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Application of Exogenous GnRH in Food Animal Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eman M HassaneinAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, 21545 Alexandria, Egypt.
Nesrein M HashemAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, 21545 Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-0058-9671
Kheir El-Din M El-AzrakAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, 21545 Alexandria, Egypt.
Antonio Gonzalez-BulnesDepartamento de Reproduccion Animal, INIA, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s/n., 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Gamal A HassanAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, 21545 Alexandria, Egypt.
Mohamed H SalemAnimal and Fish Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, 21545 Alexandria, Egypt.
Alexandria University · EGUniversidad Cardenal Herrera CEU · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (GnRH-ChNPs) were used at different doses and routes of administration to induce ovulation in rabbits as an attempt to improve artificial insemination (AI) procedures and outcomes. In this study, the characteristics (size, polydispersity, loading efficiency, and zeta-potential) of GnRH-ChNPs and the GnRH release pattern were determined in an in vitro study. A first in vivo study assessed the pituitary and ovarian response to different GnRH-ChNPs doses and routes of administration (two i.m. doses, Group HM = 0.4 µg and Group QM = 0.2 µg, and two intravaginal doses, Group HV = 4 µg and Group QV = 2 µg) against a control group (C) receiving bare GnRH (0.8 µg). The HM, QM, and HV treatments induced an earlier LH-surge (90 min) than that observed in group C (120 min), whilst the QV treatment failed to induce such LH surge. The number of ovulation points was similar among treatments, except for the QV treatment (no ovulation points). A second in vivo study was consequently developed to determine the hormonal (progesterone, P

Indexed as

artificial-inseminationGnRHnanotechnologyovulationrabbit

Identifiers

PMID33567711
PMCPMC7914616
OpenAlexW3127685750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.