Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33567600›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021

An Estimation Algorithm for General Linear Single Particle Tracking Models with Time-Varying Parameters.

Boris I Godoy, Nicholas A Vickers, Sean B Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Synthetic Stochastic Motion Platform for Testing Single Particle Tracking Microscopes.IEEE transactions on control systems technology : a publication of the IEEE Control Systems Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Real-Time Feedback-Driven Single-Particle Tracking: A Survey and Perspective.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boris I GodoyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0304-7907
Nicholas A VickersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2293-9671
Sean B AnderssonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7575-3507

Funding

Joint estimation of motion model, model parameters, and particle trajectories in single particle trackingR01GM117039 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI ANDERSSON, SEAN B. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS NIGMS 5R01GM117039-02NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single Particle Tracking (SPT) is a powerful class of methods for studying the dynamics of biomolecules inside living cells. The techniques reveal the trajectories of individual particles, with a resolution well below the diffraction limit of light, and from them the parameters defining the motion model, such as diffusion coefficients and confinement lengths. Most existing algorithms assume these parameters are constant throughout an experiment. However, it has been demonstrated that they often vary with time as the tracked particles move through different regions in the cell or as conditions inside the cell change in response to stimuli. In this work, we propose an estimation algorithm to determine time-varying parameters of systems that discretely switch between different linear models of motion with Gaussian noise statistics, covering dynamics such as diffusion, directed motion, and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamics. Our algorithm consists of three stages. In the first stage, we use a sliding window approach, combined with Expectation Maximization (EM) to determine maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters as a function of time. These results are only used to roughly estimate the number of model switches that occur in the data to guide the selection of algorithm parameters in the second stage. In the second stage, we use Change Detection (CD) techniques to identify where the models switch, taking advantage of the off-line nature of the analysis of SPT data to create non-causal algorithms with better precision than a purely causal approach. Finally, we apply EM to each set of data between the change points to determine final parameter estimates. We demonstrate our approach using experimental data generated in the lab under controlled conditions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalLinear ModelsSingle Molecule Imagingfluorescencesingle molecule biophysicssingle particle tracking

Identifiers

PMID33567600
PMCPMC7915553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.