Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33567576›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2021

Current Promising Biomarkers and Methods in the Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review.

Pavla Bradacova, Ludek Slavik, Jana Ulehlova, Adela Skoumalova, Jana Ullrychova, Jana Prochazkova, Antonin Hlusi, Gayane Manukyan, Eva Kriegova

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Antibodies to Domain I βDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Detection of IgA Antiphospholipid Antibodies Does not Improve Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification: A two-Center Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavla BradacovaMasaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem, Department Clinical Hematology, 40113 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-4432
Ludek SlavikDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jana UlehlovaDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Adela SkoumalovaDepartment of Internal Medicine III-Nephrology, Rheumatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jana UllrychovaMasaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem, Department Clinical Hematology, 40113 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Jana ProchazkovaDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Antonin HlusiDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, Palacky University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Gayane ManukyanDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and Faculty Hospital, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Eva KriegovaDepartment of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and Faculty Hospital, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
University Hospital Olomouc · CZKrajská Zdravotní · CZ

Funding

University hospital Olomouc MH CZ-DRO (FNOL, 00098892Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci UP_202_002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulation condition associated with the incidence of heterogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which non-specifically affect hemostasis processes. APS is clinically manifested by recurrent arterial and venous thromboses and reproduction losses. The aPL antibodies, which may induce clinical manifestations of APS, include criteria antibodies anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, and lupus anticoagulant, but also non-criteria antibodies, for example anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-annexin V, and many others. APS occurs mostly in patients of younger and middle age, most frequently in females. Laboratory diagnostics of APS are quite difficult, as they include a wide spectrum of examining methods, which are based on various principles of detection and are performed using various laboratory techniques. The objective of the review is to describe the current state of potentially examined biomarkers and methods in APS diagnostics. The aforementioned biomarkers are lupus anticoagulant, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I, anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I domain I, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I IgA, anti-cardiolipin IgA, anti-annexin V and II, anti-prothrombin, anti-cardiolipin/vimentin, anti-protein S/protein C, and antibodies against phospholipid antigens for whose diagnostics we may use some of the methods established for a long time and some of the modern methods-the coagulation method for the determination of lupus anticoagulant (LA), enzyme-linked imunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence analysis (CLIA), multiplex fluorescence flow immunoassay (MFFIA), fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (EliA), line immunoassay (LIA), multiline dot assay (MLDA), and thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Conclusion: Antibodies against phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, cardiolipin/vimentin complex, and annexin V are currently the most studied new markers. However, these assays have not been standardized until now, both from the laboratory and clinical point of view. In this review we summarize the evidence of the most studied aPL markers and their potential clinical significance in seronegative APS (SN-APS).

Indexed as

anti-annexinanti-cardiolipinanti-cardiolipin/vimentinanti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombinantiphospholipid syndromeanti-β2-glycoprotein-Ichemiluminescence analysisELISAfluorescence enzyme immunoassayline immunoassaylupus anticoagulantmultiplex fluorescence flow immunoassayseronegative APSthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID33567576
PMCPMC7914732
OpenAlexW3126513742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.