Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33567466›Full record

GuidelineEuropean journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie2022

Surgical Management of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Guideline from the European Pediatric Surgeons' Association Evidence and Guideline Committee.

Francesco Morini, Kelly M A Dreuning, Maarten J H Janssen Lok, Tomas Wester, Joep P M Derikx, Florian Friedmacher, Hiromu Miyake, Haitao Zhu, Luca Pio, Martin Lacher and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Groin hernia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Francesco MoriniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Neonatology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Instituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy.
Kelly M A DreuningDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten J H Janssen LokDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tomas WesterDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Joep P M DerikxDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Florian FriedmacherDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Hiromu MiyakeDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Haitao ZhuDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Luca PioDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Hôpital Universitaire Robert-Debré, University of Paris, Paris, France.
Martin LacherDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefania SgróDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Augusto ZaniDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simon EatonDevelopmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
L W Ernest van HeurnDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Agostino PierroDivision of General and Thoracic Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-6570
University of Toronto · CAEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITGoethe University Frankfurt · DEGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SELeipzig University · DEShizuoka Children's Hospital · JPUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInguinal hernia repair represents the most common operation in childhood; however, consensus about the optimal management is lacking. Hence, recommendations for clinical practice are needed. This study assesses the available evidence and compiles recommendations on pediatric inguinal hernia. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe European Pediatric Surgeons' Association Evidence and Guideline Committee addressed six questions on pediatric inguinal hernia repair with the following topics: (1) open versus laparoscopic repair, (2) extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal repair, (3) contralateral exploration, (4) surgical timing, (5) anesthesia technique in preterm infants, and (6) operation urgency in girls with irreducible ovarian hernia. Systematic literature searches were performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), and The Cochrane Library. Reviews and meta-analyses were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement.

resultsSeventy-two out of 5,173 articles were included, 27 in the meta-analyses. Laparoscopic repair shortens bilateral operation time compared with open repair. In preterm infants, hernia repair after neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)/hospital discharge is associated with less respiratory difficulties and recurrences, regional anesthesia is associated with a decrease of postoperative apnea and pain. The review regarding operation urgency for irreducible ovarian hernia gained insufficient evidence of low quality.

conclusionLaparoscopic repair may be beneficial for children with bilateral hernia and preterm infants may benefit using regional anesthesia and postponing surgery. However, no definite superiority was found and available evidence was of moderate-to-low quality. Evidence for other topics was less conclusive. For the optimal management of inguinal hernia repair, a tailored approach is recommended taking into account the local facilities, resources, and expertise of the medical team involved.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopySurgeonsChildFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature

Identifiers

PMID33567466
OpenAlexW3127954260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.