Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33567243›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2021

Utilization, Timing, and Outcomes of BRCA Genetic Testing Among Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer From a National Commercially Insured Population: The ABOARD Study.

Joanne Armstrong, Kristian Lynch, Katherine S Virgo, Marc D Schwartz, Sue Friedman, Marleah Dean, James E Andrews, Elizabeth Bourquardez Clark, Joanna Clasen, Jessica Conaty and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Timing ofCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne ArmstrongAetna, Women's Health, Hartford, CT.
Kristian LynchHealth Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Katherine S VirgoSchool of Public Health, Emory University Rollins, Atlanta, GA.
Marc D SchwartzLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Sue FriedmanFacing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Inc (FORCE), Tampa, FL.
Marleah DeanCommunication Department, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
James E AndrewsSchool of Information, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Elizabeth Bourquardez ClarkHealth Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Joanna ClasenHealth Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Jessica ConatyHealth Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Olivia ParrilloHealth Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Rebecca SutphenHealth Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
University of South Florida · USEmory University · USFacing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USHartford Financial Services (United States)

Funding

Impact of BRCA Testing on Newly Diagnosed U.S. Breast Cancer PatientsR01CA172743 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI SUTPHEN, REBECCA · 2013 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate timing and outcomes of BRCA testing and definitive surgical treatment among patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

methodsPatient-reported (n = 1,381) and deidentified health-plan (n = 2,369) data were analyzed from a consecutive national series of 3,750 women whose healthcare providers ordered BRCA testing between March 2014 and June 2015, within 1 year following breast cancer diagnosis.

resultsAmong 1,209 respondents, 54.4% received the genetic test results presurgery, 23.2% tested presurgery but received the results postsurgery, and 22.3% tested postsurgery. Patients aware of mutation-positive results presurgery were more likely to choose bilateral mastectomy (BLM) (n = 32/37) compared with patients who learned of positive results postsurgery (n = 14/32), (odds ratio [OR] = 8.23, 95% CI = 2.55 to 26.59,

conclusionNearly half of participants did not receive BRCA results presurgery, which limited their ability to make fully informed surgical treatment decisions. This may represent suboptimal care for unaware mutation-positive patients compared with those who were aware presurgery. Women > 50 who test negative are significantly less likely to choose BLM, a costly surgery that does not confer survival advantage, if they are aware of negative results presurgery. These results have important implications for quality of care and costs in the US health system.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic TestingHumansMastectomy

Identifiers

PMID33567243
PMCPMC8202055
OpenAlexW3127543690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.