Trial reportAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2021
A prospective phase II study of raltitrexed combined with S-1 as salvage treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.
Trial report in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02618356 (A Phase II Clinical Study of Combined Use of Raltitrexed and S-1 as Treatment for Patients With Metastasizing Colorectal Cancer Failed of Standard Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Clinical Study of Combined Use of Raltitrexed and S-1 as Treatment for Patients With Metastasizing Colorectal Cancer Failed of Standard Chemotherapy
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Phase II Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy Rechallenge with or without Targeted Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Comparing effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel plus raltitrexedCancer biology & medicine · 2023Trial
- A prospective phase II study of raltitrexed combined with S-1 as salvage treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2021Trial
- Exploiting the Achilles' heel of cancer through a structure-based drug-repurposing approach and experimental validation of top drugs using the TRAP assay.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- Article
- In-silico identification of novel inhibitors of human androgen receptors and prostrate-specific membrane antigen: a comprehensive target-based molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and ADME-toxicity studies.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus raltitrexed or S-1 versus standard third-line therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- A randomized phase II trial of hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus raltitrexed versus oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Treatment Response, Survival Benefit and Safety Profile of PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Apatinib Versus Apatinib Monotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimA third-line chemotherapy regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is not available in China. Studies have shown that raltitrexed or S-1 has no complete cross-resistance with fluorouracil (5-FU). In this phase II study, we prospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed combined with S-1 (RS regimen) in the treatment of mCRC after the failure of conventional chemotherapy.
methodsA total of 105 patients with mCRC with progression following treatment with 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan were enrolled between November 2015 and May 2019. Patients received intravenous infusion of raltitrexed (3 mg/m
resultsIn the intention-to-treat patients, the objective response and disease control rates were 7.62% and 48.57%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 2.5 and 8.0 months, respectively. Common adverse events included neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea, while neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia nausea, diarrhea, skin eruption, and oral ulceration had grade 3 or higher adverse events. Subgroup analysis revealed that primary site or gene mutation status had little influence on the RS regimen efficacy, while the baseline albumin level, 5-FU administration in second-line therapy, and number of previous treatment regimens affected the efficacy.
conclusionThe RS regimen demonstrated favorable effects in patients with mCRC following failure of standard chemotherapy, and could be a new choice for third-line treatment, and must be verified in future randomized clinical trials (Clinical trial: NCT02618356).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.