Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33566868›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Confirming validity of The Fear of COVID-19 Scale in Japanese with a nationwide large-scale sample.

Haruhiko Midorikawa, Miyuki Aiba, Adam Lebowitz, Takaya Taguchi, Yuki Shiratori, Takafumi Ogawa, Asumi Takahashi, Sho Takahashi, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Tetsuaki Arai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haruhiko MidorikawaMajors of Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1329-0046
Miyuki AibaFaculty of Human Sciences, Toyo Gakuen University, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Adam LebowitzGeneral Studies Department, Jichi Medical University, Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Takaya TaguchiDivision of Clinical Medicine, Department of Disaster and Community Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yuki ShiratoriDepartment of Psychiatry, Tsukuba University Health Center, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3269-4169
Takafumi OgawaMajors of Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Asumi TakahashiMajors of Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3076-889X
Sho TakahashiDivision of Clinical Medicine, Department of Disaster and Community Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kiyotaka NemotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Tetsuaki AraiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hirokazu TachikawaDivision of Clinical Medicine, Department of Disaster and Community Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing fear and anxiety regarding COVID-19 viral infection is essential for investigating mental health during this epidemic. We have developed and validated a Japanese-language version of The Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) based on a large, nationwide residential sample (n = 6,750) recruited through news and social media responding to an online version of the questionnaire. Data was collected from August 4-25, 2020. Results correlated with K6, GAD-7 and IES-R psychological scales, and T-tests and analysis of variance identified associated factors. All indices indicated the two-factor model emotional fear reactions and symptomatic expressions of fear a better fit for our data than a single-factor model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (χ2 = 164.16, p<0.001, CFI 0.991, TLI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.043). Socio-demographic factors identified as disaster vulnerabilities such as female sex, sexual minority, elderly, unemployment, and present psychiatric history associated with higher scores. However, respondent or family member experience of infection risk, or work/school interference from confinement, had greatest impact. Results suggest necessity of mental health support during this pandemic similar to other disasters.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceAnxietyBiological ProductsCOVID-19FearFemaleHumansJapanMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedSex CharacteristicsberactantBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID33566868
PMCPMC7875410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.