ArticlePloS one2021
A new perspective from time use research on the effects of social restrictions on COVID-19 behavioral infection risk.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote working and experiential wellbeing: A latent lifestyle perspective using UK time use survey before and during COVID-19.PloS one · 2024Article
- Locking Down Gender Roles? A Time-Use Perspective on Gender Division of Household Labour during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Belgium.Journal of family issues · 2023Article
- Gender differences in time use across age groups: A study of ten industrialized countries, 2005-2015.PloS one · 2022Article
- Changes in physical activity and sedentary time in United States adults in response to COVID-19.PloS one · 2022Article
- Barriers and benefits of primary caregivers' involvement in children's education during COVID-19 school closures.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2021Article
- Using time-use diaries to track changing behavior across successive stages of COVID-19 social restrictions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Article
- Changes in the quantity and quality of time use during the COVID-19 lockdowns in the UK: Who is the most affected?PloS one · 2021Article
- Transitions in patterns of caregiver involvement before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent transition analysis.Early childhood research quarterlyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present findings from three waves of a population-representative, UK time-use diary survey conducted both pre- and in real time during full 'lockdown', and again following the easing of social restrictions. We used an innovative online diary instrument that has proved both reliable and quick-to-field. Combining diary information on activity, location, and co-presence to estimate infection risks associated with daily behavior, we show clear changes in risk-associated behavior between the pre, full-lockdown and post full-lockdown periods. We document a shift from more to less risky daily behavior patterns (combinations of activity/location/co-presence categories) between the pre-pandemic pattern and full lockdown in May/June 2020, followed by a reversion (although not a complete reversal) of those patterns in August 2020 following the end of the first lockdown. Because, in general, a populations' time use changes relatively slowly, the behavioral changes revealed may be interpreted as a consequence of the UK COVID-19 lockdown social restrictions and their subsequent relaxation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.