Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33566845›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative data of Y-90 imaging in SPECT/CT and PET/CT phantom studies.

Agata Kubik, Anna Budzyńska, Krzysztof Kacperski, Maciej Maciak, Michał Kuć, Piotr Piasecki, Maciej Wiliński, Marcin Konior, Mirosław Dziuk, Edward Iller

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative evaluation ofMedical physics · 2024
    Article
  4. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phantom-based evaluation of yttrium-90 datasets using biograph vision quadra.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  9. Lesion Quantification Accuracy of DigitalJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pre- and post-treatment image-based dosimetry inPhysics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Post Yttrium-90 Imaging.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agata KubikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7506-1308
Anna BudzyńskaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0382-4462
Krzysztof KacperskiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej MaciakRadiological Metrology and Biomedical Physics Division (H2), National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Michał KućRadiological Metrology and Biomedical Physics Division (H2), National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-0743
Piotr PiaseckiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej WilińskiRadiological Metrology and Biomedical Physics Division (H2), National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Marcin KoniorNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Radioisotope Centre POLATOM, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
Mirosław DziukDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Edward IllerNational Centre for Nuclear Research, Radioisotope Centre POLATOM, Otwock-Świerk, Poland.
National Centre for Nuclear Research · PLWojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to assess the feasibility of SPECT and PET Y-90 imaging, and to compare these modalities by visualizing hot and cold foci in phantoms for varying isotope concentrations. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe data was acquired from the Jaszczak and NEMA phantoms. In the Jaszczak phantom Y-90 concentrations of 0.1 MBq/ml and 0.2 MBq/ml were used, while higher concentrations, up to 1.0 MBq/ml, were simulated by acquisition time extension with respect to the standard clinical protocol of 30 sec/projection for SPECT and 30 min/bed position for PET imaging. For NEMA phantom, the hot foci had concentrations of about 4 MB/ml and the background 0.1 or 0.0 MBq/ml. All of the acquired data was analysed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative assessment was conducted by six observers asked to identify the number of visible cold or hot foci. Inter-observer agreement was assessed. Quantitative analysis included calculations of contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and comparisons with the qualitative results.

resultsFor SPECT data up to two cold foci were discernible, while for PET four foci were visible. We have shown that CNR (with Rose criterion) is a good measure of foci visibility for both modalities. We also found good concordance of qualitative results for the Jaszczak phantom studies between the observers (corresponding Krippendorf's alpha coefficients of 0.76 to 0.84). In the NEMA phantom without background activity all foci were visible in SPECT/CT images. With isotope in the background, 5 of 6 spheres were discernible (CNR of 3.0 for the smallest foci). For PET studies all hot spheres were visible, regardless of the background activity.

conclusionsPET Y-90 imaging provided better results than Bremsstrahlung based SPECT imaging. This indicates that PET/CT might become the method of choice in Y-90 post radioembolization imaging for visualisation of both necrotic and hot lesions in the liver.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingYttrium RadioisotopesHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyYttrium-90Yttrium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID33566845
PMCPMC7875374
OpenAlexW3126496056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.