Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33566791›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2021

Infection Control Behavior at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study of a Web-Based Behavioral Intervention (Germ Defence).

Ben Ainsworth, Sascha Miller, James Denison-Day, Beth Stuart, Julia Groot, Cathy Rice, Jennifer Bostock, Xiao-Yang Hu, Katherine Morton, Lauren Towler and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nasal sprays and a behavioural intervention for respiratory tract infections in primary care: 12-month follow-up of a randomised open-label trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effectiveness of communications in enhancing adherence to public health behavioural interventions: a COVID-19 evidence review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ben AinsworthDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-1092
Sascha MillerSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1949-5774
James Denison-DaySchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0223-0005
Beth StuartPrimary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-7437
Julia GrootDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7419-0711
Cathy RiceSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5961-2413
Jennifer BostockPolicy Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9261-9350
Xiao-Yang HuPrimary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-7999
Katherine MortonSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-0314
Lauren TowlerSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-0927
Michael MoorePrimary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-4509
Merlin WillcoxPrimary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5227-3444
Tim ChadbornPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6264-3843
Natalie GoldPublic Health England Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0706-1618
Richard AmlôtBehavioural Science Team, Emergency Response Department Science and Technology, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3481-6588
Paul LittlePrimary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-1873
Lucy YardleySchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-883X
University of Southampton · GBPublic Health England · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_19068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo control the COVID-19 pandemic, people should adopt protective behaviors at home (self-isolation, social distancing, putting shopping and packages aside, wearing face coverings, cleaning and disinfecting, and handwashing). There is currently limited support to help individuals conduct these behaviors.

objectiveThis study aims to report current household infection control behaviors in the United Kingdom and examine how they might be improved.

methodsThis was a pragmatic cross-sectional observational study of anonymous participant data from Germ Defence between May 6-24, 2020. Germ Defence is an open-access fully automated website providing behavioral advice for infection control within households. A total of 28,285 users sought advice from four website pathways based on household status (advice to protect themselves generally, to protect others if the user was showing symptoms, to protect themselves if household members were showing symptoms, and to protect a household member who is at high risk). Users reported current infection control behaviors within the home and intentions to change these behaviors.

resultsCurrent behaviors varied across all infection control measures but were between sometimes (face covering: mean 1.61, SD 1.19; social distancing: mean 2.40, SD 1.22; isolating: mean 2.78, SD 1.29; putting packages and shopping aside: mean 2.75, SD 1.55) and quite often (cleaning and disinfecting: mean 3.17, SD 1.18), except for handwashing (very often: mean 4.00, SD 1.03). Behaviors were similar regardless of the website pathway used. After using Germ Defence, users recorded intentions to improve infection control behavior across all website pathways and for all behaviors (overall average infection control score mean difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.29-0.31).

conclusionsSelf-reported infection control behaviors other than handwashing are lower than is optimal for infection prevention, although handwashing is much higher. Advice using behavior change techniques in Germ Defence led to intentions to improve these behaviors. Promoting Germ Defence within national and local public health and primary care guidance could reduce COVID-19 transmission.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFamily CharacteristicsHealth BehaviorHumansInfection ControlSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdombehavior changeCOVID-19digital healthdigital medicineinfection controlinfectious diseasenovel coronavirusprotection

Identifiers

PMID33566791
PMCPMC7909304
OpenAlexW3126086162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.