Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33566703›Full record

Trial reportHip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy2022

Evaluation of a new cemented highly cross-linked all-polyethylene cup: a prospective and randomised study assessing wear and fixation characteristics using radiostereometric analysis.

Volker Otten, Daniel Wästerlund, John Lindbjörn, Carl Mertens, Sebastian Mukka, Sead Crnalic, Kjell G Nilsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04322799 (A Randomized Controlled RSA Study Comparing the 2nd Generation Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene to Conventional Polyethylene in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04322799 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled RSA Study Comparing the 2nd Generation Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene to Conventional Polyethylene in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled57ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Hip, Arthroplasty ComplicationsArmsDevice: Randomization between prosthetic components
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Volker OttenDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Daniel WästerlundDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
John LindbjörnDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Carl MertensDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sebastian MukkaDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Sead CrnalicDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Kjell G NilssonDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe aim of this prospective, randomised and controlled study was to evaluate the wear and fixation properties of a new cemented highly cross-linked all-polyethylene (HXLPE) cup in comparison with a conventional cemented ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (ConvPE) cup using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 58 patients (58 hips) with primary osteoarthritis (OA) were enrolled in a randomised controlled trial to receive either a ConvPE cup (control) or HXLPE cup (intervention) with identical geometry. The subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was proximal wear measured as femoral head penetration into the cup, secondary outcomes were 3D-wear and annual proximal wear from 1 to 5 years. Cup fixation was measured as movement of the cup in relation to the acetabular bone with proximal migration being the primary outcome measure, 3D-migration and change in inclination as secondary outcomes. The patients were followed for 5 years with RSA performed postoperatively, at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months.

resultsThe HXLPE displayed a lower median proximal femoral head penetration compared to ConvPE, with a median difference at 2 years of -0.07 mm (95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04 mm), and -0.19 mm (95% CI, -0.27 to -0.15 mm) at 5 years. Annual proximal wear between 1 and 5 years was 0.03 mm/year for HXLPE and 0.06 mm/year for ConvPE (mean difference 0.05 mm, [95% CI, 0.03-0.07 mm]). Proximal migration, 3D migration and change in inclination was numerically slightly higher for HXLPE, albeit not statistically significant.

conclusionsCompared to ConvPE, the HXLPE cup displayed significantly lower polyethylene wear. Cup migration was not statistically significant different. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04322799.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisHumansPolyethyleneProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRadiostereometric AnalysisPolyethyleneHighly cross-linked polyethylenemigrationRCTRSAwear

Identifiers

PMID33566703
PMCPMC9726741
OpenAlexW3127871329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.