Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33566250›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2021

Understanding quality and equity: patient experiences with care in older adults diagnosed with hematologic malignancies.

Alex Fauer, Sung Won Choi, Lauren P Wallner, Matthew A Davis, Christopher R Friese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Patient preferences and choices as a reflection of trust-A cluster analysis comparing postsurgical perceptions in a private and a public hospital.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex FauerSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. alfauer@ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7811-1593
Sung Won ChoiMedical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lauren P WallnerMedical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Matthew A DavisSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Christopher R FrieseSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls St., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
Roadmap 2.0: A randomized controlled trial using a technology-mediated platform in family caregivers of BMT patientsR01HL146354 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHOI, SUNG WON · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Patient-Oriented Research and Mentoring in Hematopoietic Cell TransplantationK24HL156896 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SUNG WON CHOI · 2021 to 2026
$870k
American Cancer Society 33507-DSCN-19-048-01-SCNNCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P30-CA-046592NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL156896NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL146354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOncology settings increasingly use patient experience data to evaluate clinical performance. Given that older patients with hematologic malignancies are a high-risk population, this study examined factors associated with patient-reported health care experiences during the first year of their cancer diagnosis.

methodsCross-sectional study using the 2000-2015 SEER-CAHPS® data to examine patient experiences of Medicare enrollees with a primary diagnosis of leukemia or lymphoma. The primary outcomes were three CAHPS assessments: overall care, personal doctor, and health plan overall. We estimated case-mix adjusted and fully adjusted associations between factors (i.e., clinical and sociodemographic) and the CAHPS outcomes using bivariate statistical tests and multiple linear regression.

resultsThe final sample included 1,151 patients, with 431 diagnosed with leukemia and 720 diagnosed with lymphoma (median time from diagnosis to survey 6 months). Patients who completed the survey further apart from the diagnosis date reported significantly higher adjusted ratings of care overall (β .39, p = .008) than those closer to diagnosis. American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, and Pacific Islander patients had lower adjusted ratings of care overall (β - .73, p = .003) than Non-Hispanic white patients. Multimorbidity was significantly associated with higher adjusted personal doctor ratings (β .26, p = .003).

conclusionsUnfavorable patient experiences among older adults diagnosed with hematologic malignancies warrant targeted efforts to measure and improve care quality. Future measurement of experiences of cancer care soon after diagnosis, coupled with careful sampling of high-priority populations, will inform oncology leaders and clinicians on strategies to improve care for high-risk, high-cost populations.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlaska NativesComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMedicareNative Hawaiian or Pacific IslanderPatient Outcome AssessmentPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareSEER ProgramConsumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS)Health care qualityHematologic diseasesPatient experience

Identifiers

PMID33566250
PMCPMC7946754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.