Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33566173›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2022

Involuntary reflexive pelvic floor muscle training in addition to standard training versus standard training alone for women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

Helena Luginbuehl, Corinne Lehmann, Irene Koenig, Annette Kuhn, Reto Buergin, Lorenz Radlinger

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Urinary Incontinence: Epidemiology and Physiotherapeutic Approaches- A Systematic Review.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena LuginbuehlDepartment of Health Professions, Division of Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Murtenstrasse 10, 3008, Bern, Switzerland. helena.luginbuehl@bfh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-7144
Corinne LehmannDepartment of Physiotherapy, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Irene KoenigDepartment of Health Professions, Division of Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Murtenstrasse 10, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Annette KuhnUrogynaecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Women's Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Reto BuerginDepartment of Health Professions, Division of Nursing, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
Lorenz RadlingerDepartment of Health Professions, Division of Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Murtenstrasse 10, 3008, Bern, Switzerland.
Bern University of Applied Sciences · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation, Division III (Medicine & Biology) 320030_153424/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisAlthough involuntary reflexive pelvic floor muscle contractions seem crucial during stress urinary incontinence-provoking situations, hitherto existing guidelines feature voluntary pelvic floor muscle training only. Two pelvic floor muscle protocols were compared regarding their effect on stress urinary incontinence in women: one focusing on standard physiotherapy with voluntary pelvic floor muscle training, the other additionally including involuntary reflexive pelvic floor muscle training.

methodsThis study was designed as a triple-blind prospective randomized controlled trial with women suffering from stress urinary incontinence with two physiotherapy intervention groups (control group: standard physiotherapy, n = 48, experimental group: standard physiotherapy plus involuntary reflexive pelvic floor muscle training triggered by whole-body movements such as jumps n = 48). Both interventions lasted 16 weeks (9 personal physiotherapy consultations and 78 home training sessions). Group differences and development over time were analyzed concerning the primary outcome International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Urinary Incontinence short form (ICIQ-UIsf) by mixed effect regression models.

resultsThe ICIQ-UIsf score decreased significantly over time for both groups by about 3 points from about 10 to about 7 points with no group differences at any point in time. DISCUSSION: This trial did not find any additional benefit for stress urinary incontinence by adding involuntary reflexive pelvic floor muscle training to standard training. Both training protocols showed similar clinically relevant improvements; however, there was still moderate incontinence after interventions. Future studies should test and apply pelvic floor muscle function-oriented training methods for pelvic floor muscle hypertrophy, intramuscular coordination, and power, which are more in line with conventional skeletal muscle training, i.e., performed with higher intensities and workout.

Indexed as

Urinary IncontinenceUrinary Incontinence, StressExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPelvic FloorPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeExerciseMuscle contractionPhysical therapy modalitiesReflex

Identifiers

PMID33566173
PMCPMC8885550
OpenAlexW3128243796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.