ArticlePediatric radiology2021
Use of compressed sensing to reduce scan time and breath-holding for cardiac cine balanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging in children and young adults.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between compressed sensing and segmented cine cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Application of AI-assisted compressed sensing cine sequence in the assessment of cardiac function in children with Kawasaki disease.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Retrospective temporal resolution interpolation alters myocardial strain quantification on compressed sensing cine CMR.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Accelerated Cardiac Cine Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accelerated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning for volumetric assessment in children.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
- Clinical utility of a rapid two-dimensional balanced steady-state free precession sequence with deep learning reconstruction.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Article
- Compact pediatric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging protocols.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: faster is better.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Compressed Sensing Cardiac Cine Imaging Compared with Standard Balanced Steady-State Free Precession Cine Imaging in a Pediatric Population.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2022Article
- Feasibility of one breath-hold cardiovascular magnetic resonance compressed sensing cine for left ventricular strain analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional pediatric volumetric MRI acquisitions of a short-axis stack typically require multiple breath-holds under anesthesia.
objectiveHere, we aimed to validate a vendor-optimized compressed-sensing approach to reduce scan time during short-axis balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine imaging. MATERIALS AND
methodsImaging was performed in 28 patients (16±9 years) in this study on a commercial 3-tesla (T) scanner using retrospective electrocardiogram-gated cine bSSFP. Cine short-axis images covering both ventricles were acquired with conventional parallel imaging and a vendor-optimized parallel imaging/compressed-sensing approach. Qualitative Likert scoring for blood-myocardial contrast, edge definition, and presence of artifact was performed by two experienced radiologists. Quantitative comparisons were performed including biventricular size and function. A paired t-test was used to detect significant differences (P<0.05).
resultsScan duration was 7±2 s/slice for conventional imaging (147±33 s total) vs. 4±2 s/slice for compressed sensing (83±28 s total). No significant differences were found with qualitative image scores for blood-myocardial contrast, edge definition, and presence of artifact. No significant differences were found in volumetric analysis between the two sequences. The number of breath-holds was 10±4 for conventional imaging and 5±3 for compressed sensing.
conclusionCompressed sensing allowed for a 50% reduction in the number of breath-holds and a 43% reduction in the total scan time without differences in the qualitative or quantitative measurements as compared to the conventional technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.