Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33566106›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis Among Adults With Gastric Adenocarcinoma Managed With Total Gastrectomy.

Harbi Khalayleh, Young-Woo Kim, Hong Man Yoon, Keun Won Ryu, Myeong-Cherl Kook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Current Trends in Gastric Cancer Surgery and Postoperative Care.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harbi KhalaylehCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Young-Woo KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hong Man YoonCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Keun Won RyuCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Myeong-Cherl KookCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
National Cancer Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It is unclear whether proximal gastrectomy (PG) can replace total gastrectomy (TG), even in cases of advanced gastric carcinoma. Objectives: To evaluate the oncologic safety of PG based on the lymph node (LN) metastasis rate and develop a selection diagram for PG eligibility. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of gastric carcinoma surgery was performed including procedures that took place between December 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, in the National Cancer Center, Korea, a high-volume carcinoma center with a structured database and accurate long-term follow-up. Among 9952 patients who underwent surgery for gastric carcinoma, 2347 underwent TG. Six-hundred fifty-five (564 in a second statistical analysis) had gastric carcinoma in the upper third of the stomach. The inclusion criteria were age 18 to 85 years, histologically proven adenocarcinoma (any size or differentiation) located in the upper third of the stomach, curative R0 TG performed, and postoperative follow-up for at least 3 years. Exclusion criteria included Borrmann type 4 carcinoma, T4 category, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and a history of other carcinomas. Data analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020. Exposures: Total gastrectomy and LN dissection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the rate of LN metastasis at LN stations 4d, 5, and 6, which are usually not dissected during PG. Results: Among the 655 study patients, the mean (SD) age was 57.7 (11.9) years, and 462 (70.5%) were men. Only those with poorly differentiated cT3 category carcinomas had an increased incidence of LN metastasis at stations 4d (2 of 32 [6.3%]) and 11d (T3N0: 2 of 22 [9.1%], T3N1: 3 of 27 [11.1%]), independent of tumor size. For cT1-T3N0/1M0 category carcinomas, the incidence of station 5 LN metastasis was 0, irrespective of tumor size and differentiation. The LN metastasis rate at stations 4d and 6 for cT1-T3N0/1M0 differentiated tumors was also 0. Tumor size greater than or equal to 4.1 cm was associated with significantly increased LN metastasis compared with tumors less than 4.1 cm (40.0% vs 20.4%, P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that PG can be safely performed for cT1-T2N0/1M0 tumors less than 4.1 cm in diameter that are located in the upper third of the stomach. The cT3N0/1M0-differentiated tumors less than 4.1 cm may also be eligible for PG, whereas poorly differentiated cT3 tumors and any cT4 or cN2/3 diseases require TG.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedCohort StudiesFemaleGastrectomyHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingStomach NeoplasmsTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID33566106
PMCPMC7876588
OpenAlexW3126187852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.