Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33565288›Full record

ReviewJBRA assisted reproduction2021

Final destination of surplus cryopreserved embryos. What decision should be made?

Carlos Wilson Dala Paula Abreu Abreu, Maria Lúcia Andrade Abreu, Maria Mariana Andrade Abreu, João Pedro Andrade Abreu, Luiz Fernando Cal Silva, Ines Katerina Damasceno Cavallo Cruzeiro, Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlos Wilson Dala Paula Abreu AbreuFaculdade de Medicina do Centro Universitário UNIFAMINAS - Muriaé/MG/Brasil.
Maria Lúcia Andrade AbreuClínica MedCenter de Muriaé - MG/Brasil.
Maria Mariana Andrade AbreuHospital Governador Israel Pinheiro - IPSEMG - Belo Horizonte/MG/Brasil.
João Pedro Andrade AbreuFaculdade de Medicina do Centro Universitário UNIFAMINAS - Muriaé/MG/Brasil.
Luiz Fernando Cal SilvaFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - UFJF/Brasil.
Ines Katerina Damasceno Cavallo CruzeiroPrograma de Residência Médica em Reprodução Assistida da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG/ Brasil.
Rui Manuel Lopes NunesFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto - FMUP - Porto/Portugal.
Hospital São Paulo · BRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BRUniversitario Francisco de Asís · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate what data exists in the literature about the fate of SCE.

methodsThis is an integrative review of papers published in the last ten years, in the Medline and PubMed databases on the subject.

resultsthe studies included in this review demonstrate that the difficulties in defining the fate of surplus cryopreserved embryos are mainly due to the absence of specific legislation in most countries. Sociocultural and demographic factors such as religion, treatment period, ethnicity, income, marital status, economic status and education level are factors that influence the choice of the final destination of ECE. This study demonstrated that in most of the countries evaluated, the law or regulations do not provide clear guidance on the final destination of the surplus cryopreserved embryos, although it is reasonable to consider that the law will treat embryos, after a certain period of time, as abandoned. Accurate information about the desired destination of the surplus cryopreserved embryos is needed from the beginning of the breeding process to minimize future problems.

conclusionsWe conclude that this is a controversial issue, involving ethical, legal, moral and financial issues, that lack specific legislation in almost all of the countries evaluated, which contributes to indecision, abandonment, and it hinders the final destination of these embryos.

Indexed as

CryopreservationEmbryo DispositionFertilization in VitroHumanscryopreservationembryoethicalfinal embryo disposalin vitro fertilization

Identifiers

PMID33565288
PMCPMC8083851
OpenAlexW3128595624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.