Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33565010›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Reduced Laparoscopic Intra-abdominal Pressure During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Its Effect on Post-operative Pain: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control Trial.

Elliot Gin, Darren Lowen, Mark Tacey, Russell Hodgson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06966596 (Effect of Low-Dose Ketamine Infusion on Quality and Duration of Post-Operative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecyctectomy Under General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06966596 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Low-Dose Ketamine Infusion on Quality and Duration of Post-Operative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecyctectomy Under General Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorFazaia Ruth Pfau Medical CollegeRan2024 to 2025Enrolled116ConditionsLaparoscopic CholecystectomyArmsKetamine only, Placebo Normal Saline (NS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Impact of Pneumoperitoneum Pressure on Post-Cholecystectomy Pain.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elliot GinDepartment of Surgery, Northern Health, 185 Cooper St, Epping, VIC, Australia.
Darren LowenDepartment of Anaesthetics, Northern Health, Epping, Australia.
Mark TaceyDepartment of Research, Northern Health, Epping, Australia.
Russell HodgsonDepartment of Surgery, Northern Health, 185 Cooper St, Epping, VIC, Australia. russell.hodgson@nh.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4772-516X
Northern Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic surgery is regarded as the gold standard for the surgical management of cholelithiasis. To improve post-operative pain, low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LPLC) have been trialed. A recent systematic review found that LPLC reduced pain; however, many of the randomised control trials were at a high risk of bias and the overall quality of evidence was low.

methodsOne hundred patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomised to a LPLC (8 mmHg) or a standard pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy (12 mmHg) (SPLC) with surgeons and anaesthetists blinded to the pressure. Pressures were increased if vision was compromised. Primary outcomes were post-operative pain and analgesia requirements at 4-6 h and 24 h.

resultsIntra-operative visibility was significantly reduced in LPLC (p<0.01) resulting in a higher number of operations requiring the pressure to be increased (29% vs 8%, p=0.010); however, there were no differences in length of operation or post-operative outcomes. Pain scores were comparable at all time points across all pressures; however, recovery room fentanyl requirement was more than four times higher when comparing 8 to 12 mmHg (12.5mcg vs 60mcg, p=0.047). Nausea and vomiting was also higher when comparing these pressures (0/36 vs 7/60, p=0.033). Interestingly, when surgeons estimated the operating pressure, they were correct in only 69% of cases.

conclusionAlthough pain scores were similar, there was a significant reduction in fentanyl requirement and nausea/vomiting in LPLC. Although LPLC compromised intra-operative visibility requiring increased pressure in some cases, there was no difference in complications, suggesting LPLC is safe and beneficial to attempt in all patients.

trial registrationRegistered with the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000205134).

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicLaparoscopyElective Surgical ProceduresHumansPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPostoperative PainLaparoscopic cholecystectomyLow-pressure pneumoperitoneumPost-operative painStandard pressure pneumoperitoneumSurgeon visibility

Identifiers

PMID33565010
OpenAlexW3127060974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.