ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2021
Physicomechanical, stability, and pharmacokinetic evaluation of aceclofenac dimethyl urea cocrystals.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor physicomechanical properties and limited aqueous solubility restrict the bioavailability of aceclofenac when given orally. To improve its above properties, aceclofenac (ACE) was cocrystallized with dimethyl urea (DMU) in 1:2 molar ratio by dry and solvent assisted grinding. The cocrystals were characterized by ATR-FTIR, DSC, and PXRD, and their surface morphology was studied by SEM. There was enhancement in intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) (~eight- and ~fivefold in cocrystals prepared by solvent assisted grinding (SAG) and solid state grinding (SSG), respectively, in 0.1 N HCl, pH 1.2) and similarly (~3.42-fold and ~1.20-fold in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) as compared to pure drug. Additionally, mechanical properties were assessed by tabletability curves. The tensile strength of ACE was < 1 MPa in contrast to the cocrystal tensile strength (3.5 MPa) which was ~1.98 times higher at 6000 psi. The tablet formulation of cocrystal by direct compression displayed enhanced dissolution profile (~36% in 0.1 N HCl, pH 1.2, and ~100% in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) in comparison to physical mixture (~ 30% and ~ 80%) and ACE (~18% and ~50%) after 60 min, respectively. Stability studies of cocrystal tablets for 3 months indicated a stable formulation. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed by using rabbit model. The AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.