Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33564920›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Engineering of primary metabolic pathways for titer improvement of milbemycins in Streptomyces bingchenggensis.

Yuqing Liu, Haiyan Wang, Shanshan Li, Yanyan Zhang, Xu Cheng, Wensheng Xiang, Xiangjing Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improving butenyl-spinosyn production inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic Comparisons Revealed the Key Genotypes ofBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuqing LiuSchool of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, No. 59 Mucai Street, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, China.
Haiyan WangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Shanshan LiState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yanyan ZhangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xu ChengState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, China.
Wensheng XiangSchool of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, No. 59 Mucai Street, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, China. xiangwensheng@neau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-5985
Xiangjing WangSchool of Life Science, Northeast Agricultural University, No. 59 Mucai Street, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150030, China. wangneau2013@163.com.
Institute of Plant Protection · CNNortheast Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31572070National Natural Science Foundation of China 31872936National Natural Science Foundation of China 31972291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milbemycins are used commercially as insect repellents and acaricides; however, their high cost remains a significant challenge to commercial production. Hence, improving the titer of milbemycins for commercial application is an urgent priority. The present study aimed to effectively increase the titer of milbemycins using a combination of genome re-sequencing and metabolic engineering. First, 133 mutation sites were identified by genome re-sequencing in the mutagenized high-yielding strain BC04. Among them, three modifiable candidate genes (sbi_04868 encoding citrate synthase, sbi_06921 and sbi_06922 encoding alpha and beta subunits of acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and sbi_04683 encoding carbon uptake system gluconate transporter) related to primary metabolism were screened and identified. Next, the DNase-deactivated Cpf1-based integrative CRISPRi system was used in S. bingchenggensis to downregulate the transcription level of gene sbi_04868. Then, overexpression of the potential targets sbi_06921-06922 and sbi_04683 further facilitated milbemycin biosynthesis. Finally, those candidate genes were engineered to produce strains with combinatorial downregulation and overexpression, which resulted in the titer of milbemycin A3/A4 increased by 27.6% to 3164.5 mg/L. Our research not only identified three genes in S. bingchenggensis that are closely related to the production of milbemycins, but also offered an efficient engineering strategy to improve the titer of milbemycins using genome re-sequencing. KEY POINTS: • We compared the genomes of two strains with different titers of milbemycins. • We found three genes belonging to primary metabolism influence milbemycin production. • We improved titer of milbemycins by a combinatorial engineering of three targets.

Indexed as

MacrolidesStreptomycesMetabolic EngineeringMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMacrolidesmoxidectinCRISPRi systemMilbemycinsRe-sequencingS. bingchenggensisTiter improvement

Identifiers

PMID33564920
OpenAlexW3129053281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.