Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33564900›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021

[The critically ill CAR T-cell patient : Relevant toxicities, their management and challenges in critical care].

J Garcia Borrega, K Heindel, M Kochanek, C Warnke, J Stemmler, M von Bergwelt-Baildon, T Liebregts, B Böll

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Intensive care nursing for oncological patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  2. [Patients with cancer: a challenge for emergency departments].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [With a tumor diagnosis in the intensive care unit].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J Garcia BorregaKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
K HeindelKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
M KochanekKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
C WarnkeKlinik für Neurologie, Klinikum der Universität Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
J StemmlerMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
M von Bergwelt-BaildonMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
T LiebregtsKlinik für Innere Medizin V, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
B BöllKlinik I für Innere Medizin, Schwerpunkt Internistische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. boris.boell@uk-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCAR‑T cell therapy has been implemented as clinical routine treatment option during the last decade. Despite beneficial outcomes in many patients severe side effects and toxicities are seen regularly that can compromise the treatment success.

methodsLiterature review: CAR T‑cell therapy, toxicities and their management

resultsThe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are seen regularly after CAR T‑cell treatment. CRS symptoms can range from mild flu-like symptoms to severe organ dysfunction requiring vasopressor therapy, mechanical ventilation and other intensive care support. ICANS symptoms usually develop later and can range from disorientation and aphasia to potentially life-threatening brain edema. IL‑6 is a key factor in the pathophysiology of CRS. The pathophysiology of ICANS is not fully understood. The ASTCT consensus grading is recommended to stratify patients for different management options. An interdisciplinary team including hematologist, intensivist, neurologists and other specialties is needed to optimize the treatment. DISCUSSION: Severe and potentially life-threatening toxicities occur regularly after CAR T‑cell therapy. Treatment strategies for CRS and ICANS still need to be evaluated prospectively. Due to the increasing number of patients treated with CAR T‑cells the number of patients requiring temporary intensive care management due to CRS and ICANS is expected to increase during the next years.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessImmunotherapy, AdoptiveCritical CareCytokine Release SyndromeHumansT-LymphocytesAdoptive immunotherapyCytokine release syndromeIntensive care unitsInterleukin‑6Neurotoxicity syndromes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.