Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33564897›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Three years of cannabis as medicine-preliminary results of the survey accompanying the prescription of medical cannabis in Germany].

Gabriele Schmidt-Wolf, Peter Cremer-Schaeffer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prescriptions of Cannabinoid Drugs, 2019-2022.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phytochemical Constituents and Derivatives ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review: Cannabinoids as Medicinals.Current addiction reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriele Schmidt-WolfBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bundesopiumstelle, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.
Peter Cremer-SchaefferBundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bundesopiumstelle, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland. Peter.Cremer-Schaeffer@bfarm.de.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Germany, physicians who prescribe medical cannabis flowers or cannabis-based medicines (narcotic prescription) at the expense of the statutory health insurance are obliged to take part in a noninterventional accompanying survey that runs until 31 March 2022.At the time of this interim evaluation, 11 May 2020, there were 10,010 complete datasets collected. The most frequently treated symptoms were pain (73%), followed by spasticity (10%), and anorexia/wasting (6%). Dronabinol (i.e., prescription drug or Marinol®) was most frequently (65%) prescribed, followed by cannabis flowers (18%), Sativex® (13%), cannabis extract (4%, with increasing frequency), and nabilone (0.3%). The 6485 cases treated with dronabinol already allows a subgroup evaluation concerning efficacy. The typical cannabis side effects of tiredness, dizziness, dry mouth, and nausea occur with all cannabis medicines, and correspond to those already known from the product information of the cannabis-based medicinal products authorized under the pharmaceutical law. The potentially serious adverse effects of depression, suicidal ideation, delusions, hallucinations, dissociation, and misperceptions were each reported with a frequency higher than 0.1%. There were remarkable differences between patients treated with cannabis flowers and those with other cannabis medicines.Patients treated with cannabis flowers are significantly younger and predominantly male. They are treated more often by general practitioners and internists, their diagnosis differs more often from the typical diagnoses (pain, spasticity, anorexia/wasting), and they have more prior experience with cannabis. The underreporting in the accompanying survey is mainly in this patient group.

Indexed as

CannabisMedical MarijuanaMedicineGermanyHumansMalePrescriptionsMedical MarijuanaIndicationsInterim evaluationMedical cannabisPrescriptionSide effects

Identifiers

PMID33564897
PMCPMC7932947
OpenAlexW3128321688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.