ReviewHealth policy and planning2021
Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review.
Review in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- How to do (or not to do) realist evaluations to advance theory, practice, and justice in health systems research.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- [Opportunities for intersectoral work in health promotion: Analysis of an urban regeneration program in Chile].Atencion primaria · 2026Article
- Strategies to Facilitate Interorganizational Collaboration in County-Level Opioid Overdose Prevention and Response: A Qualitative Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Power dynamics and intersectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Strategic partnership for Health in All Policies and sustainable transport in Scotland: a case study evaluation.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Rethinking Healthy Societies: A Critical Commentary on Policy Levers and Enablers Comment on "How to Build Healthy Societies: A Thematic Analysis of Relevant Conceptual Frameworks".International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Building Responsive Intersectoral Initiatives for Newcomers in Toronto: Learning from Service Providers' Experiences in the Context of COVID‑19.Annals of global health · 2025Article
- Understanding the influence of power dynamics in intersectoral collaboration: A realist evaluation in Assam, India.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Methods for evaluating intersectoral action partnerships to address the social determinants of health: a scoping review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024Article
- Navigating intersectoral collaboration in nutrition programming: implementors' perspectives from Assam, India.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Examining the Contextual Factors Influencing Intersectoral Action for the SDGs: Insights From Canadian Federal Policy Leaders.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Strengthening collaboration within Dutch municipalities for a healthier living environment: experiences and possible improvements according to civil servants.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Equilibrium in the governance of cross-sectoral policies: how does it translate into practice?Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- Learning from intersectoral initiatives to respond to the needs of refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants without status in the context of COVID-19 in Quebec and Ontario: a qualitative multiple case study protocol.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Multidomain and multilevel strategies to improve equity in maternal and newborn health services in Nepal: perspectives of health managers and policymakers.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- How to Build Healthy Societies: A Thematic Analysis of Relevant Conceptual Frameworks.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Recommendations for developing urban interventions to promote physical activity: interviews with key informants in Europe.Cities & health · 2023Article
- Facilitators and barriers of intersectoral co-operation to promote healthier and more environmentally friendly behaviour: a qualitative evaluation through focus groups for the INHERIT project.BMC public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intersectoral action (ISA) is considered pivotal for achieving health and societal goals but remains difficult to achieve as it requires complex efforts, resources and coordinated responses from multiple sectors and organizations. While ISA in health is often desired, its potential can be better informed by the advanced theory-building and empirical application in real-world contexts from political science, public administration and environmental sciences. Considering the importance and the associated challenges in achieving ISA, we have conducted a meta-narrative review, in the research domains of political science, public administration, environmental and health. The review aims to identify theory, theoretical concepts and empirical applications of ISA in these identified research traditions and draw learning for health. Using the multidisciplinary database of SCOPUS from 1996 to 2017, 5535 records were identified, 155 full-text articles were reviewed and 57 papers met our final inclusion criteria. In our findings, we trace the theoretical roots of ISA across all research domains, describing the main focus and motivation to pursue collaborative work. The literature synthesis is organized around the following: implementation instruments, formal mechanisms and informal networks, enabling institutional environments involving the interplay of hardware (i.e. resources, management systems, structures) and software (more specifically the realms of ideas, values, power); and the important role of leaders who can work across boundaries in promoting ISA, political mobilization and the essential role of hybrid accountability mechanisms. Overall, our review reaffirms affirms that ISA has both technical and political dimensions. In addition to technical concerns for strengthening capacities and providing support instruments and mechanisms, future research must carefully consider power and inter-organizational dynamics in order to develop a more fulsome understanding and improve the implementation of intersectoral initiatives, as well as to ensure their sustainability. This also shows the need for continued attention to emergent knowledge bases across different research domains including health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.