ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2020
A Deep Spatial Context Guided Framework for Infant Brain Subcortical Segmentation.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinally consistent registration and parcellation of cortical surfaces using semi-supervised learning.Medical image analysis · 2024Article
- Four-dimensional mapping of dynamic longitudinal brain subcortical development and early learning functions in infants.Nature communications · 2023Article
- An attention-based context-informed deep framework for infant brain subcortical segmentation.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- ID-Seg: an infant deep learning-based segmentation framework to improve limbic structure estimates.Brain informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate subcortical segmentation of infant brain magnetic resonance (MR) images is crucial for studying early subcortical structural growth patterns and related diseases diagnosis. However, dynamic intensity changes, low tissue contrast, and small subcortical size of infant brain MR images make subcortical segmentation a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a spatial context guided, coarse-to-fine deep convolutional neural network (CNN) based framework for accurate infant subcortical segmentation. At the coarse stage, we propose a signed distance map (SDM) learning UNet (SDM-UNet) to predict SDMs from the original multi-modal images, including T1w, T2w, and T1w/T2w images. By doing this, the spatial context information, including the relative position information across different structures and the shape information of the segmented structures contained in the ground-truth SDMs, is used for supervising the SDM-UNet to remedy the bad influence from the low tissue contrast in infant brain MR images and generate high-quality SDMs. To improve the robustness to outliers, a Correntropy based loss is introduced in SDM-UNet to penalize the difference between the ground-truth SDMs and predicted SDMs in training. At the fine stage, the predicted SDMs, which contains spatial context information of subcortical structures, are combined with the multi-modal images, and then fed into a multi-source and multi-path UNet (M2-UNet) for delivering refined segmentation. We validate our method on an infant brain MR image dataset with 24 scans by evaluating the Dice ratio between our segmentation and the manual delineation. Compared to four state-of-the-art methods, our method consistently achieves better performances in both qualitative and quantitative evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.