ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2021
Intraoperative Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Flap-Based Breast Reconstruction: Does It Change Outcomes?
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intra-arterial catheters: An evidence-based review of device design, function and application.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the lack of guidelines regarding the use of intra-arterial lines in postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR), they continue to be used in this setting. In this study of patients undergoing PMBR, we aimed to (1) identify factors associated with intra-arterial line placement, (2) analyze the correlation between intra-arterial monitoring and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring, and (3) investigate whether hemodynamic management differs significantly between patients undergoing intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring versus NIBP.
methodsAll patients undergoing flap-based PMBR between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were pair-matched based on flap donor site, BMI, and age to identify factors associated with intra-arterial line placement. Methods described by Bland and Altman
resultsThirty-two patients were included with 16 patients in the intra-arterial line group and 16 in the NIBP group. None of the factors studied were significantly related to the likelihood of intra-arterial line placement. Agreement analysis demonstrated that mean arterial pressures calculated from intra-arterial line readings were as much as 23 points lower or 12 points higher than those from NIBP. Bias calculations with this extent of difference suggest poor correlation between intra-arterial line readings and NIBP. There was no difference between groups in rate of administration of blood-pressure altering medications (hypertensive: n = 3, 18.8%,
conclusionOur findings highlight the need for more definitive guidance regarding the use of intra-arterial monitoring in patients undergoing PMBR.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.