Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33564493›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics2021

Increased colon transit time and faecal load in irritable bowel syndrome.

Dennis Raahave, Andreas K Jensen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis RaahaveDepartment of Gastroenterology and Surgery, Copenhagen University North Sealand Hospital, Hilleroed 3400, Denmark. dr.dr@dadlnet.dk.
Andreas K JensenFaculty of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Hilleroed 3400, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a bowel disorder involving abdominal pain or discomfort along with irregularity of stool form and passage frequency. The pathophysiology is poorly understood and seems to be multifactorial. Investigations of possible causes of IBS have included only a few colonic transit studies and no simultaneous determination of the colonic faecal content.

aimTo compare colon transit time and faecal load between IBS-patients and healthy control subjects.

methodsThe study included 140 patients with IBS, with a mean age of 50.0 years. The control group comprised 44 healthy persons with a mean age of 43.4 years, who were selected at random from the National Civil Register. Both the patient group and the control group underwent a marker study to measure colon transit time (CTT) and to calculate a faecal loading score. The patient group underwent treatment with a combined prokinetic regime, after which their CTT and faecal loading were reassessed. Analyses were performed to compare measurements between the control group and the patient group before and after treatment.

resultsCompared to healthy controls, IBS-patients exhibited a significantly prolonged mean CTT (45.48 h

conclusionIBS-patients exhibited prolonged CTT and heavier faecal loading. These assessments may aid in diagnosis. Faecal retention may contribute to IBS symptoms, which can be treated using a prokinetic regime.

Indexed as

Colon transit timeFaecal loadFaecal retentionFunctional bowel diseaseIrritable bowel syndrome

Identifiers

PMID33564493
PMCPMC7844574
OpenAlexW3119641397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.