Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33564374›Full record

ReviewSleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)

Sleep quality monitoring in individual sports athletes: parameters and definitions by systematic review.

Mário Antônio de Moura Simim, Helton de Sá Souza, Carlos Alberto Cardoso Filho, Rodrigo Luiz da Silva Gianoni, Roberto Rodrigues Bezerra, Helvio de Oliveira Affonso, Alberto Carlos Amadio, Vânia D'Almeida, Júlio Cerca Serrão, João Gustavo Claudino

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sleep quality and athletic performance according to chronotype.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mário Antônio de Moura SimimFederal University of Ceará, Institute of Physical Education and Sports - Fortaleza - Ceará - Brazil.
Helton de Sá SouzaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo -Brazil.
Carlos Alberto Cardoso FilhoUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics- Brazil.
Rodrigo Luiz da Silva GianoniPaulista University - UNIP.
Roberto Rodrigues BezerraUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo -Brazil.
Helvio de Oliveira AffonsoAppto Physiology, Laboratory of Exercise, Nutrition and Sports Training, Espirito Santo - Vitoria - Espírito Santo - Brazil.
Alberto Carlos AmadioUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics- Brazil.
Vânia D'AlmeidaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Departamento de Psicobiologia - São Paulo -Brazil.
Júlio Cerca SerrãoUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics- Brazil.
João Gustavo ClaudinoUniversidade de São Paulo, School of Physical Education and Sport - Laboratory of Biomechanics- Brazil.
Universidade Paulista · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present review, we identify which instruments and parameters are used for sleep quality monitoring in individual sport athletes and which definitions were used for sleep quality parameters in this literature field. Systematic searches for articles reporting the qualitative markers related to sleep in team sport athletes were conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science online databases. The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews. The initial search returned 3316 articles. After the removal of duplicate articles, eligibility assessment, 75 studies were included in this systematic review. Our main findings were that the most widely used measurement instruments were Actigraphy (25%), Rating Likert Scales (16%) and Sleep Diary (13%). On sleep quality parameters (Sleep duration = 14%; Wake after sleep onset = 14%; Sleep Quality = 12%; Sleep Effciency = 11% and Sleep Latency = 9%), the main point is that there are different definitions for the same parameters in many cases reported in the literature. We conclude that the most widely used instruments for monitoring sleep quality were Actigraphy, Likert scales and Sleep diary. Moreover, the definitions of sleep parameters are inconsistent in the literature, hindering the understanding of the sleep-sport performance relationship.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformanceSleep ParametersSport PerformanceSports Medicine

Identifiers

PMID33564374
PMCPMC7856669
OpenAlexW3120227003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.