Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33564245›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2021

Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli from a Clinical Specimen in Sidama, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Tsegaye Alemayehu, Solomon Asnake, Bereket Tadesse, Elshaday Azerefegn, Enkosilassie Mitiku, Asnakech Agegnehu, Netsanet Nigussie, Techilo H/Mariam, Moges Desta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Prevalence and Trends of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsegaye AlemayehuHawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science, School of Medical Laboratory Science, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-7579-8991
Solomon AsnakeHawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science, School of Medical Laboratory Science, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-3284-3323
Bereket TadesseHawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Microbiology Laboratory, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Elshaday AzerefegnHawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Microbiology Laboratory, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Enkosilassie MitikuHawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Microbiology Laboratory, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Asnakech AgegnehuHawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Microbiology Laboratory, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Netsanet NigussieHawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Microbiology Laboratory, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Techilo H/MariamHawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Microbiology Laboratory, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Moges DestaHawassa University College of Medicine and Health Science, School of Medical Laboratory Science, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Hawassa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria are an emergent source of both community-acquired and healthcare-associated infection that poses a substantial hazard to public health. This study aimed to conclude the magnitude of carbapenem resistance gram-negative bacteria from a clinical specimen at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital.

methodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study was accompanied from February 13 to June 7, 2020, in which consecutive patients with 103 gram-negative bacteria were encompassed. The isolates included were 54 urine, 17 blood, 17 pusses, 4 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 3 aspirates, 3 effusions, 2 stools, 2 ear discharges, and 1 nasal swab. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to gather socio-demographic data from the attendant and clinical data from the patient's chart. Patients admitted in any wards and visited outpatients department were included for the study if gram-negative bacteria was identified for those who accepted the consent. A routine manual culture, Gram's staining and biochemical tests used to identify the bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined for twelve antibiotics including cotrimoxazole, ceftazidime, meropenem, gentamycin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, nitrofurantoin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and amikacin using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Modified carbapenem inactivation (mCIM) method was used to determine carbapenem resistance using meropenem disk as per the recommendation of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline. Statistical package for social science software version 21 was used for data entry and analysis. The odds ratio at 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value <0.05 were taken as a statistically significant association.

resultsGenerally, 111 gram-negative bacteria were identified from 103 patients. Of 111 isolates, thirteen isolates (nine resistance and four intermediates) were identified in disk diffusion testing for meropenem. Of this, 10 isolates were carbapenemases producer with the overall rates of 9% in the Modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM).

conclusionOur study showed that carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli are 9% in the study area. Our finding signposts that ampicillin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, cotrimoxazole, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and gentamycin with a high rate of resistance >50%. However, piperacillin-tazobactam, chloramphenicol, meropenem, and amikacin were at low rates of resistance. Therefore, a measure should be taken to contain carbapenem resistance gram-negative bacteria in the study area. Further, study with better method needs to be conducted to conclude the real scenario of carbapenem resistance.

Indexed as

carbapenem resistanceclinical specimenEthiopiagram-negative bacilliHawassaphenotypic

Identifiers

PMID33564245
PMCPMC7866937
OpenAlexW3126236829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.