Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33564127›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2021

Validity of The Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS): a daily activity criterion checklist for infants and toddlers.

Colleen Peyton, Kristen Wroblewski, Jennifer Park, Caitlin Crisante, Kathleen Mariano, Nancy Lyon, Christine P Baker, Brian T Rogers, James Roistacher, Frances A Carter and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Colleen PeytonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science and Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Colleen.peyton1@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-7246
Kristen WroblewskiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer ParkGraham School of General Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Caitlin CrisanteDepartment of Pediatrics and Kennedy Research Center on Neurodevelopmental and Intellectual Disabilities, University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kathleen MarianoRobert Warner Rehabilitation Center, Women & Children's Hospital, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Nancy LyonUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Christine P BakerUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Brian T RogersChild Development & Rehabilitation Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
James RoistacherRobert Warner Rehabilitation Center, Women & Children's Hospital, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Frances A CarterDepartment of Pediatrics and Kennedy Research Center on Neurodevelopmental and Intellectual Disabilities, University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael E MsallDepartment of Pediatrics and Kennedy Research Center on Neurodevelopmental and Intellectual Disabilities, University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
WIDEA-FS Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Warner Initial Developmental Evaluation of Adaptive and Functional Skills (WIDEA-FS) is a 50-item, criterion-specified questionnaire that assesses a child's adaptive skills in everyday context and can be used in high-risk follow-up settings to identify risk for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Our aim was to validate the WIDEA-FS by comparing a sample of typically developing children to children with special health needs and to compare results to the Capute Scales, which include domains of including both the Cognitive Adaptive Test (CAT) and the Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CLAMS).

methodsSix hundred and sixty children (typically developing and having special healthcare needs) aged 0-36 months completed the WIDEA-FS, the CAT, and the CLAMS assessments.

resultsChildren with special health needs scored significantly lower on the WIDEA than those with typical development. WIDEA-FS subscales were significantly associated with the CAT (WIDEA-FS self-care 0.87, social cognition 0.89) and the CLAMS (WIDEA-FS communication 0.96, social cognition 0.92) tests.

conclusionsThe WIDEA-FS has concurrent validity with the CAT and CLAMS and construct validity in that children with special health needs have significantly poorer performance on the WIDEA-FS than children with typical development. IMPACT: The WIDEA-FS demonstrated both construct validity and concurrent validity with the Capute Scales, including the Cognitive Adaptive Test (CAT) and the Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CLAMS). This is the first study to validate the use of the WIDEA-FS in children with typical development and children with special healthcare needs. The WIDEA-FS is a quick and valid checklist that can be used to assess neurodevelopmental functioning during daily activities in typically developing children and those at risk for neurodevelopmental differences.

Indexed as

ChecklistChild DevelopmentNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.