Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563989›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Reward-related choices determine information timing and flow across macaque lateral prefrontal cortex.

Hua Tang, Ramon Bartolo, Bruno B Averbeck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-term Learning Induces Plastic Changes in Frontostriatal Circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Different Subregions of Monkey Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Respond to Abstract Sequences and Their Components.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hua TangLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6168-6737
Ramon BartoloLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2165-9747
Bruno B AverbeckLaboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. averbeckbb@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-3976-8565
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Frontal Striatal Systems and Dopamine in Normal and Pathological BehaviorZIAMH002928 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI AVERBECK, BRUNO · 2010 to 2025
$29.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prefrontal cortex is critical for cognition. Although much is known about the representation of cognitive variables in the prefrontal cortex, much less is known about the spatio-temporal neural dynamics that underlie cognitive operations. In the present study, we examined information timing and flow across the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), while monkeys carried out a two-armed bandit reinforcement learning task in which they had to learn to select rewarding actions or rewarding objects. When we analyzed signals independently within subregions of the LPFC, we found a task-specific, caudo-rostral gradient in the strength and timing of signals related to chosen objects and chosen actions. In addition, when we characterized information flow among subregions, we found that information flow from action to object representations was stronger from the dorsal to ventral LPFC, and information flow from object to action representations was stronger from the ventral to dorsal LPFC. The object to action effects were more pronounced in object blocks, and also reflected learning specifically in these blocks. These results suggest anatomical segregation followed by the rapid integration of information within the LPFC.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBrain MappingChoice BehaviorLearningMacacaModels, NeurologicalNeuronsPrefrontal CortexReaction TimeReinforcement, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID33563989
PMCPMC7873307
OpenAlexW3127622457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.