Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33563841›Full record

ArticlemBio2021

Competition Sensing Changes Antibiotic Production in

Sanne Westhoff, Alexander M Kloosterman, Stephan F A van Hoesel, Gilles P van Wezel, Daniel E Rozen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pangenome ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Precise loading of scarce reagents on droplet microarrays.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factors that influence the caste ratio in a bacterial division of labour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanne WesthoffInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands s.westhoff@biology.leidenuniv.nl d.e.rozen@biology.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4347-9408
Alexander M KloostermanInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7345-110X
Stephan F A van HoeselInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gilles P van WezelInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0341-1561
Daniel E RozenInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands s.westhoff@biology.leidenuniv.nl d.e.rozen@biology.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-0239
Leiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most important ways that bacteria compete for resources and space is by producing antibiotics that inhibit competitors. Because antibiotic production is costly, the biosynthetic gene clusters coordinating their synthesis are under strict regulatory control and often require "elicitors" to induce expression, including cues from competing strains. Although these cues are common, they are not produced by all competitors, and so the phenotypes causing induction remain unknown. By studying interactions between 24 antibiotic-producing strains of streptomycetes, we show that strains commonly inhibit each other's growth and that this occurs more frequently if strains are closely related. Next, we show that antibiotic production is more likely to be induced by cues from strains that are closely related or that share secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). Unexpectedly, antibiotic production is less likely to be induced by competitors that inhibit the growth of a focal strain, indicating that cell damage is not a general cue for induction. In addition to induction, antibiotic production often decreases in the presence of a competitor, although this response was not associated with genetic relatedness or overlap in BGCs. Finally, we show that resource limitation increases the chance that antibiotic production declines during competition. Our results reveal the importance of social cues and resource availability in the dynamics of interference competition in streptomycetes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialMicrobial InteractionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiosisMultigene FamilySecondary MetabolismStreptomycesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic productioninterference competitionmicrobial ecologysocial microbiologyStreptomyces

Identifiers

PMID33563841
PMCPMC7885098
OpenAlexW3128176316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.