ArticleSaudi medical journal2021
Saudi Arabia Guidelines for diabetic macular edema: A consensus of the Saudi Retina Group.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and management of diabetic macular oedema: a systematic review.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of uncomplicated cataract surgery on central retinal thickness changes in diabetic patients: A short-term analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Diabetes Status Modifies the Association Between Carotid Plaque Burden and Retinal Microvascular Parameters.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Establishing Expert Consensus on a Unified Decision Framework for Retina Patient Care.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Prevalence of diabetic macular edema among type II diabetic patients in tele-screening program using OCT and fundus photos in a tertiary hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Diabetic Disease of the Eye in Canada: Consensus Statements from a Retina Specialist Working Group.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Recommendations for diabetic macular edema management by retina specialists and large language model-based artificial intelligence platforms.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Article
- Intravitreal DEX Implant for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review of National Consensus.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Real-world outcomes of faricimab in treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema: The Middle East perspective.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
- Barriers for adherence to diabetic retinopathy screening among Saudi adult population, 2023.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications are major public health burdens in Saudi Arabia. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is 19.7% and the prevalence of diabetic macular edema (DME) is 5.7% in Saudi Arabia. Diabetic macular edema is a vision-threatening complication of DR and a major cause of vision loss worldwide. Ocular treatments include retinal laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, intravitreal corticosteroids, and vitreoretinal surgery when necessary. The present consensus was developed as a part of the Saudi Retina Group's efforts to generate Saudi guidelines and consensus for the management of DME, including recommendations for its diagnosis, treatment, and best practice. The experts' panel stipulates that the treatment algorithm should be categorized according to the presence of central macula involvement. In patients with no central macular involvement, laser photocoagulation is recommended as the first-line option. Patients with central macular involvement and no recent history of cardiovascular (CVS) or cerebrovascular disorders can be offered anti-VEGF agents as the first-line option. In the case of non-responders (defined as an improvement of <20% in optical coherence tomography or a gain of fewer than 5 letters in vision), switching to another anti-VEGF agent or steroids should be considered after 3 injections. Within the class of steroids, dexamethasone implants are recommended as the first choice. In patients with a recent history of CVS events, the use of anti-VEGF agents is not recommended, regardless of their lens status. The experts' panel recommends that a future study be conducted to provide a cut-off point for early switching to steroid implants in pseudo-phakic eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.